Krebs W, Erbel R, Schweizer P, Richter H A, Henn G, Massberg I, Meyer J, Effert S
Z Kardiol. 1982 Jun;71(6):413-20.
The irregularity and complexity of the right ventricle is the reason why no accurate method for right ventricular volume determination exists. A new method for right ventricular volume determination particularly for two-dimensional echocardiography was developed-it is called subtraction method-and was compared with the pyramid and Simpson's methods. The partial volume of the left ventricle and septum was subtracted from total volume of right and left ventricle including interventricular septum. Thus right ventricular volume resulted. Total and partial volume were computer-assisted calculated by use of biplane methods, preferably Simpson's rule. The method was proved with thinwall silicon-rubber model hearts of the left and right ventricle. Two orthogonal planes in the long-axis were filmed by radiography or scanned in a water bath by two-dimensional echocardiography equivalent to RAO and LAO-projections of cineangiocardiograms or to four- and two-chamber views of apical two-dimensional echocardiograms. For calculation of the major axes of the elliptical sections, summed up by Simpson's rule, they were derived from the LAO-projection and the four-chamber view, respectively, the minor axis approximated from the RAO-projection and the two-chamber view. For comparison of direct-measured volume and two-dimensional echocardiographically determined volume, regression equation was given by y = 1.01 x -3.2, correlation-coefficient, r = 0.977, and standard error of estimate (SEE) +/- 10.5 ml. For radiography, regression equation was y = 0.909 x + 13.3,r = 0.983, SEE = +/- 8.0 ml. For pyramid method and Simpson's rule, higher standard errors and lower correlation coefficients were found. Between radiography and two-dimensional echocardiography a mean difference of 4.3 +/- 13.2 ml, using subtraction method, and -10.2 +/- 22.9 ml, using pyramid method, as well as -0,6 +/- 18.5 ml, using Simpson's rule, were calculated for right ventricular volume measurements. Differences were not significant. The subtraction method seems to be useful for calculation of right ventricular volume by radiography as well as two-dimensional echocardiography. Further studies in isolated hearts and patients are necessary for final judgment of the accuracy of this new method.
右心室的不规则性和复杂性导致目前不存在准确测定右心室容积的方法。本文开发了一种专门用于二维超声心动图的右心室容积测定新方法——减法法,并将其与棱锥法和辛普森法则进行了比较。从包括室间隔在内的左右心室总体积中减去左心室和室间隔的部分容积,从而得出右心室容积。总体积和部分容积通过双平面法(最好是辛普森法则)进行计算机辅助计算。该方法在左右心室的薄壁硅橡胶模型心脏上得到了验证。通过射线照相在长轴方向拍摄两个正交平面,或在水浴中通过二维超声心动图进行扫描,这相当于心血管造影的右前斜位(RAO)和左前斜位(LAO)投影,或心尖二维超声心动图的四腔心和两腔心视图。为了计算通过辛普森法则汇总的椭圆形截面的长轴,它们分别从LAO投影和四腔心视图中得出,短轴则从RAO投影和两腔心视图中近似得出。为了比较直接测量的容积和二维超声心动图测定的容积,给出回归方程y = 1.01x - 3.2,相关系数r = 0.977,估计标准误差(SEE)为±10.5 ml。对于射线照相,回归方程为y = 0.909x + 13.3,r = 0.983,SEE = ±8.0 ml。对于棱锥法和辛普森法则,发现标准误差更高,相关系数更低。在右心室容积测量中,使用减法法时,射线照相和二维超声心动图之间的平均差异为4.3 ± 13.2 ml,使用棱锥法时为 - 10.2 ± 22.9 ml,使用辛普森法则时为 - 0.6 ± 18.5 ml。差异不显著。减法法似乎对于通过射线照相以及二维超声心动图计算右心室容积很有用。对于该新方法准确性的最终判定,还需要在离体心脏和患者中进行进一步研究。