Dohrenwend B P, Dohrenwend B S
Am J Public Health. 1982 Nov;72(11):1271-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.11.1271.
Two generations of epidemiological studies of the true prevalence of mental disorders have been conducted since the turn of the century. The first and smaller in number took place prior to World War II and was characterized by the use of records and key informants to define "cases." The second, utilizing the greatly expanded nomenclatures that followed World War II, were based for the most part on personal interviews with all subjects or samples there of in communities all over the world. In total, more than 80 different communities were studied by more than 60 different investigators or teams of investigators in these first and second generation studies. The legacy from these studies comes in two main parts: the first consists of methodological problems centering on the question of how to conceptualize and measure mental disorders independently of treatment status; the second is a set of consistent substantive findings about the amounts of various types of mental disorder, the proportions treated and untreated by members of the mental health professions, and the distribution of the disorders according to gender, rural vs urban location, and social class. Analyses of this legacy from first and second generation studies are presented with a view to developing informed speculations about what might be hoped for in the future, vastly different, third generation of studies in this field.
自世纪之交以来,已经开展了两代关于精神障碍真实患病率的流行病学研究。第一代研究数量较少,在第二次世界大战之前进行,其特点是利用记录和关键信息提供者来界定“病例”。第二代研究利用了第二次世界大战后大幅扩展的术语表,大部分基于对世界各地社区的所有研究对象或其样本进行的个人访谈。在这些第一代和第二代研究中,共有80多个不同社区被60多个不同的研究者或研究团队进行了研究。这些研究的遗产主要有两个部分:第一部分是围绕如何独立于治疗状况来概念化和测量精神障碍这一问题的方法学问题;第二部分是关于各类精神障碍的数量、精神卫生专业人员治疗和未治疗的比例,以及这些障碍根据性别、城乡位置和社会阶层的分布情况的一系列一致的实质性发现。本文对第一代和第二代研究的这一遗产进行了分析,以期对该领域未来可能截然不同的第三代研究的期望进行有见地的推测。