Baron M, Gruen R, Asnis L, Kane J
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1982 Apr;65(4):253-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1982.tb00845.x.
Data on schizoaffective illness, schizophrenia and affective disorders were gathered on first-degree relatives of schizoaffective probands and matched controls (bipolars, unipolars and schizophrenics). The familial pattern of affective and schizophrenic subtypes of schizoaffective disorder resembled the familial pattern of affective and schizophrenic probands, respectively. The overall risk for the spectrum of schizoaffective and affective disorders was higher among relatives of schizoaffective-manic as compared to relatives of schizoaffective-depressive probands, although the difference fell short of significance. When tested for consistency with multiple threshold hypotheses of genetic transmission, schizoaffective illness did not qualify as either a more extreme form of affective illness nor as a disorder that occupies an intermediate position between bipolar and unipolar disorders or is genetically milder than affective disorder. The implications of diagnostic subtyping for genetic research in the major psychoses were discussed.
收集了精神分裂症-情感障碍患者的一级亲属以及匹配对照(双相情感障碍患者、单相情感障碍患者和精神分裂症患者)的精神分裂症-情感障碍、精神分裂症和情感障碍的数据。精神分裂症-情感障碍的情感亚型和精神分裂症亚型的家族模式分别类似于情感障碍先证者和精神分裂症先证者的家族模式。与精神分裂症-抑郁先证者的亲属相比,精神分裂症-躁狂患者的亲属中精神分裂症-情感障碍和情感障碍谱系的总体风险更高,尽管差异未达到显著水平。在检验与遗传传递的多个阈值假设的一致性时,精神分裂症-情感障碍既不符合情感障碍的更极端形式,也不符合介于双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍之间的中间位置的疾病,或者在遗传上比情感障碍更轻微的疾病。讨论了诊断亚型对主要精神病遗传研究的影响。