Suppr超能文献

[汽车运动病的视觉预防]

[Visual prevention from motion sickness in cars].

作者信息

Probst T, Krafczyk S, Büchele W, Brandt T

出版信息

Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970). 1982;231(5):409-21. doi: 10.1007/BF00342721.

Abstract

The differential effects of vision on motion sickness in cars were tested under real road conditions using linear accelerations, in order to confirm earlier laboratory results on visual modulation of vestibular nausea induced by angular accelerations of the body. The 18 voluntary subjects were exposed to repetitive braking maneuvers (linear accelerations: 0.1-1.2 g) on a highway. The simultaneous visual stimulus conditions for the 3 separate days were: I) eyes open, visual control of car motion; II) eyes closed; III) eyes open, artificial stationary visual field (reading). The severity of motion sickness (magnitude estimation 1-10) was a function of the visual stimulus condition with significant differences among these conditions: I) moderate nausea (less than 1) with adequate visual motion perception; II) medium nausea (approximately equal to 2) with eyes closed and somatosensory-vestibular excitation only; III) strong nausea (greater than 5) with conflicting sensory input, when vestibular acceleration is in disagreement with the visual information of no movement. Providing ample peripheral vision of the relatively moving surround is the best strategy to alleviate car sickness.

摘要

为了证实早期实验室关于身体角加速度引起的前庭性恶心的视觉调节的研究结果,在真实道路条件下利用线性加速度测试了视觉对晕车的不同影响。18名志愿者在高速公路上接受重复刹车操作(线性加速度:0.1 - 1.2g)。在3个不同日期的同时视觉刺激条件分别为:I)睁眼,视觉控制汽车运动;II)闭眼;III)睁眼,人工静止视野(阅读)。晕车的严重程度(1 - 10级的量级估计)是视觉刺激条件的函数,这些条件之间存在显著差异:I)有足够的视觉运动感知时为中度恶心(小于1级);II)仅闭眼且有体感 - 前庭兴奋时为中度恶心(约等于2级);III)当前庭加速度与无运动的视觉信息不一致,存在冲突的感觉输入时为强烈恶心(大于5级)。提供相对移动周围环境的充足周边视觉是减轻晕车的最佳策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验