Rao D V, Bedwinek J, Perez C, Lee J, Fineberg B
Cancer. 1982 Nov 15;50(10):2037-43. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19821115)50:10<2037::aid-cncr2820501012>3.0.co;2-b.
One hundred eighty-three patients with Stage III and nonmetastatic Stage IV breast cancer, seen between 1960-1975 at the Division of Radiation Oncology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, were retrospectively analyzed to determine the prognostic significance of the following clinical features: (1) "grave signs" (skin ulceration, skin fixation, chest wall fixation, and edema); (2) size of primary tumor; (3) nodal stage; and (4) inflammatory changes. Since therapy among 147 patients with noninflammatory cancer comprised of either irradiation alone (54 patients) or surgery plus irradiation (93 patients), all the above factors were analyzed also with respect to the method of treatment. In 147 patients with noninflammatory carcinoma, the local failure rate, regional failure rate, distant failure rate and five-year disease free survival were all unaffected by the presence or absence of "grave signs," whether treated by irradiation alone or surgery plus irradiation. The size of the primary tumor, in patients treated with irradiation alone, influenced the rate of local failure (44% for tumors 0-8 cm and 76% for tumors greater than or equal to 8 cm) and five-year disease-free survival (30 versus 4%, respectively). Such a statistically significant difference in local failure rate or disease-free survival was not noted when treated with combined modality. N stage also influenced the prognosis in patients treated with irradiation alone since the regional failure rate increased from 9% for N0, N1 to 58% for N2, N3 patients. This was reflected in a decreased disease-free survival (4 versus 30%) for patients with advanced nodal disease who were treated with irradiation alone. No such difference was noted when the nodal disease was treated with a combination of surgery and irradiation. The 36 patients with inflammatory carcinoma had essentially the same incidence of local, regional and distant failure as the 147 patients with noninflammatory carcinoma but the appearance of distant metastases occurred significantly earlier in patients with inflammatory carcinoma than in those with noninflammatory carcinoma. This earlier appearance of distant metastases was reflected in the significantly lower disease-free survival for the patients with inflammatory carcinoma (6 versus 28%). The data from this analysis suggests that consideration should be given to removing the presence of grave signs from the current AJC staging system and substituting in its place the size of the primary tumor (less than 8 cm versus greater than or equal to 8 cm). Further analysis on a large number of patients is needed to substantitate this recommendation.
对1960年至1975年间在马林克罗特放射研究所放射肿瘤学部就诊的183例III期和非转移性IV期乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析,以确定以下临床特征的预后意义:(1)“严重体征”(皮肤溃疡、皮肤固定、胸壁固定和水肿);(2)原发肿瘤大小;(3)淋巴结分期;(4)炎症改变。由于147例非炎性癌患者的治疗包括单纯放疗(54例)或手术加放疗(93例),上述所有因素也根据治疗方法进行了分析。在147例非炎性癌患者中,无论单独放疗还是手术加放疗,局部失败率、区域失败率、远处失败率和五年无病生存率均不受“严重体征”有无的影响。单独接受放疗的患者,原发肿瘤大小影响局部失败率(0至8厘米肿瘤为44%,大于或等于8厘米肿瘤为76%)和五年无病生存率(分别为30%和4%)。采用综合治疗时,未发现局部失败率或无病生存率有如此显著的统计学差异。N分期也影响单独接受放疗患者的预后,因为区域失败率从N0、N1患者的9%增至N2、N3患者的58%。这反映在单独接受放疗的晚期淋巴结疾病患者无病生存率降低(4%对30%)。当淋巴结疾病采用手术和放疗联合治疗时,未发现此类差异。36例炎性癌患者的局部、区域和远处失败发生率与147例非炎性癌患者基本相同,但炎性癌患者远处转移的出现明显早于非炎性癌患者。远处转移的这种较早出现反映在炎性癌患者无病生存率显著降低(6%对28%)。该分析数据表明,应考虑从当前美国癌症联合委员会(AJC)分期系统中去除严重体征,并以原发肿瘤大小(小于8厘米对大于或等于8厘米)取而代之。需要对大量患者进行进一步分析以证实这一建议。