• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effect of use of a measured dispensing device on oral antibiotic compliance.

作者信息

Ellison R S, Altemeier W A

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1982 Nov;21(11):668-71. doi: 10.1177/000992288202101105.

DOI:10.1177/000992288202101105
PMID:7127989
Abstract

The substitution of a syringe in place of a teaspoon for the delivery of oral medications has become routine in some pediatric practices for reasons that are not clear. Although a syringe would measure dosages more accurately, most oral medications have a broad acceptable dose range. A possible advantage of syringes is that parents who receive these may be more impressed with the importance of treatment than those prescribed medications by teaspoon. To test this hypothesis, 72 patients below 24 months of age with otitis media were randomly divided into a group that received a prescription indicating amoxicillin should be given by teaspoon and a group that received a labeled syringe for this purpose. The qualitative presence of the antibiotic in urine at seven-day follow-up visit was 56 per cent among the teaspoon users and 67 per cent among syringe users, while return rates for one week appointments were 51 per cent and 32 per cent, respectively. Neither difference was significant. Use of a measured oral dispensing syringe did not improve compliance in administration of medication or return for follow-up and therefore, was judged not to be cost effective.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effect of use of a measured dispensing device on oral antibiotic compliance.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1982 Nov;21(11):668-71. doi: 10.1177/000992288202101105.
2
Parents can dose liquid medication accurately.家长可以准确地给孩子喂液体药物。
Pediatrics. 1997 Sep;100(3 Pt 1):330-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.3.330.
3
Variation in acceptance of common oral antibiotic suspensions.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994 Aug;13(8):686-90. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199408000-00002.
4
Efficacy of 20- versus 10-day antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media.20天与10天抗菌治疗对急性中耳炎的疗效比较。
Pediatrics. 1995 Jul;96(1 Pt 1):5-13.
5
Accuracy of oral liquid measuring devices: comparison of dosing cup and oral dosing syringe.口服液测量装置的准确性:量杯与口服给药注射器的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jan;42(1):46-52. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K420. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
6
Treatment of urinary tract infections among febrile young children with daily intravenous antibiotic therapy at a day treatment center.在日间治疗中心对发热幼儿的尿路感染采用每日静脉注射抗生素疗法进行治疗。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e469-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0421.
7
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial of amoxicillin for clinically diagnosed acute otitis media in children 6 months to 5 years of age.一项针对6个月至5岁临床诊断为急性中耳炎儿童的阿莫西林随机、双盲、安慰剂对照非劣效性试验。
CMAJ. 2005 Feb 1;172(3):335-41. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040771.
8
Topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone superior to oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in acute otitis media with otorrhea through tympanostomy tubes.在伴有鼓膜造孔管耳漏的急性中耳炎中,局部使用环丙沙星/地塞米松优于口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸。
Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):e561-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2033. Epub 2006 Jul 31.
9
Compliance of German pediatric patients with oral antibiotic therapy: results of a nationwide survey.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999 Dec;18(12):1085-91. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199912000-00012.
10
[Usefulness of fenspiride in the treatment of acute otitis media in children].[非那吡啶在儿童急性中耳炎治疗中的效用]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2005 Jun;18(108):624-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Streptococcal pharyngitis: is 10 days of therapy still mandatory?链球菌性咽炎:10天疗程是否仍然必不可少?
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Aug 15;131(4):278-9.