• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The psychiatric will. A new mechanism for protecting persons against "psychosis" and psychiatry.

作者信息

Szasz T S

出版信息

Am Psychol. 1982 Jul;37(7):762-70.

PMID:7137694
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The psychiatric will. A new mechanism for protecting persons against "psychosis" and psychiatry.精神科遗嘱。一种保护人们免受“精神病”和精神病学影响的新机制。
Am Psychol. 1982 Jul;37(7):762-70.
2
Bound to treatment: the Ulysses contract.受治疗约束：尤利西斯契约。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Jun;14(3):13-6.
3
Mental health advance directives: having one's say?精神健康预先指示：能表达自己的意愿吗？
KY Law J. 2000;89(2):327-86.
4
The Minnesota Advance Psychiatric Directive. Protecting patient decision making.《明尼苏达预先精神病指令》。保护患者的决策制定。
Minn Med. 1992 Dec;75(12):33-4.
5
Psychiatric treatment and civil liberties in Israel: the need for reform.
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1984;21(1):3-18.
6
Commentary: Psychiatric advance directives as tools for enhancing treatment of the mentally ill.评论：精神科预先指示作为加强精神病患者治疗的工具。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(1):58-60.
7
Advance directives for psychiatric treatment: a view from the trenches.精神科治疗的预先指示：来自一线的观点。
Psychol Public Policy Law. 1998 Sep;4(3):728-45.
8
Family opposition to psychiatric treatment: a medicolegal dilemma.家庭对精神科治疗的反对：一个法医学困境。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1983;11(1):51-5.
9
The involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania: a comparative analysis.美国和罗马尼亚对精神疾病患者的非自愿民事住院治疗：一项比较分析。
Rev Rom Bioet. 2003 Jan-Mar;1(1):55-88.
10
Parity of mental illness, disparity for the mental patient.
Lancet. 1999 Jan 2;353(9146):73; author reply 74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74832-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance Statements for Black African and Caribbean people (AdStAC): protocol for an implementation study.黑非洲人和加勒比人群体的预先指示（AdStAC）：一项实施研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 17;23(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04825-6.
2
A model for mental health advance directives in the new Victorian .维多利亚州新的心理健康预先指示模式
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Oct 27;29(5):779-787. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1976302. eCollection 2022.
3
The PACT advance decision-making template: preparing for Mental Health Act reforms with co-production, focus groups and consultation.
《PACT 决策前置模板：通过共同制作、焦点小组和咨询为精神卫生法改革做准备》
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jul-Aug;71:101563. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101563. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Against Ulysses contracts for patients with borderline personality disorder.反对与边缘型人格障碍患者签订契约。
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Dec;23(4):695-703. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09967-y.
5
Psychiatric Advance Directives Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities: Why Advance Instructions Should Be Able to Override Current Preferences.《残疾人权利公约》下的精神科预先指示：为何预先指示应能够推翻当前的偏好。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 11;10:631. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00631. eCollection 2019.
6
Thwarting the Diseased Will: Ulysses Contracts, the Self and Addiction.挫败患病意志：尤利西斯契约、自我与成瘾
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;39(3):380-98. doi: 10.1007/s11013-014-9416-5.
7
On psychiatric wills and the Ulysses clause: The advance directive in psychiatry.论精神科遗嘱与尤利西斯条款：精神科的预先指示
Indian J Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;54(3):206-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.102332.
8
Ulysses arrangements in psychiatric treatment: towards proposals for their use based on 'sharing' legal capacity.精神治疗中的尤利西斯契约：基于“分享”法律能力的使用建议。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Jun;22(2):114-42. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0215-2.
9
The noncompliant patient in psychiatry: the case for and against covert/surreptitious medication.精神病学中不依从治疗的患者：支持与反对秘密/偷偷用药的理由
Mens Sana Monogr. 2010 Jan;8(1):96-121. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.58822.
10
Models of advance directives in mental health care: stakeholder views.精神卫生保健中的预嘱模式：利益相关者观点
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;39(8):673-80. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0788-7.