Suppr超能文献

阿霉素与长春新碱及阿霉素对比,以及环磷酰胺与长春新碱、放线菌素-D及环磷酰胺用于晚期肉瘤的比较。

A comparison of adriamycin versus vincristine and adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide versus vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide for advanced sarcoma.

作者信息

Schoenfeld D A, Rosenbaum C, Horton J, Wolter J M, Falkson G, DeConti R C

出版信息

Cancer. 1982 Dec 15;50(12):2757-62. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19821215)50:12<2757::aid-cncr2820501211>3.0.co;2-j.

Abstract

This randomized study, conducted by the Eastern cooperative Oncology Group, compared Adriamycin (doxorubicin) (70 mg/m2) versus vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) and Adriamycin (50 mg/m2); and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) versus vincristine (1.4 mg/m2), actinomycin-D (0.4 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) for treatment of metastatic mesenchymal malignancies. The respective response rate seen in 200 evaluable patients to the treatments were, 27, 19, and 11%. The response rate to Adriamycin was significant better than the response to vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide (P = 0.03, two-sided). The respective median survivals on the three treatments were 37, 34, and 41 weeks and were not significantly different. Moderate or severe vomiting occurred in 60% of patients receiving vincristine-cyclophosphamide-adriamycin, a greater frequency than in Adriamycin alone (P = .09 two-sided) Severe or life-threatening hematologic toxicity (leukocytes less than 2000, platelets less than 50,000) occurred in 30% of patients receiving the Adriamycin combination, a markedly increased frequency when compared to the other two regimens (P equals 0.07, P = 0.02, two-sided). This trial establishes that Adriamycin has a better response rate than the combination of vincristine-actinomycin-D-cyclophosphamide in advanced sarcomas. The combination of vincristine, Adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide increased toxicity and did not add to the therapeutic effect achieved with Adriamycin alone.

摘要

这项由东部肿瘤协作组开展的随机研究,比较了阿霉素(多柔比星)(70mg/m²)与长春新碱(1.4mg/m²)及阿霉素(50mg/m²);以及环磷酰胺(750mg/m²)与长春新碱(1.4mg/m²)、放线菌素-D(0.4mg/m²)和环磷酰胺(750mg/m²)用于治疗转移性间叶组织恶性肿瘤的效果。在200例可评估患者中,各治疗方案的缓解率分别为27%、19%和11%。阿霉素的缓解率显著优于长春新碱、放线菌素-D和环磷酰胺(双侧P = 0.03)。三种治疗方案的中位生存期分别为37周、34周和41周,差异无统计学意义。接受长春新碱-环磷酰胺-阿霉素治疗的患者中,60%出现中度或重度呕吐,发生率高于单用阿霉素治疗(双侧P = 0.09)。接受阿霉素联合方案治疗的患者中,30%出现严重或危及生命的血液学毒性(白细胞少于2000,血小板少于50,000),与其他两种方案相比,发生率显著增加(双侧P = 0.07,P = 0.02)。该试验证实,在晚期肉瘤中,阿霉素比长春新碱-放线菌素-D-环磷酰胺联合方案的缓解率更高。长春新碱、阿霉素和环磷酰胺联合使用增加了毒性,但并未增强单用阿霉素所取得的治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验