• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科生物伦理学:但我们从何处开始?对作为方法的悬置的思考。

Interdisciplinary bioethics: but where do we start? A reflection of epochè as method.

作者信息

De Wachter M A

出版信息

J Med Philos. 1982 Aug;7(3):275-87. doi: 10.1093/jmp/7.3.275.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/7.3.275
PMID:7142847
Abstract

It is generally accepted that bioethics is an interdisciplinary science. Why this is so and what it means is not always clear or agreed upon and, in this author's view, its implications are insufficiently researched. On the basis of involvement in projects which were labelled interdisciplinary, the author reflects upon the method of interdisciplinarity, especially to its starting point. It is suggested that interdisciplinarity cannot thrive unless it curbs, from the very start, the inevitable reductions of all monodisciplinary approaches. This effort is called methodical epoché, ideally the temporary suspension of all known methods. Its purpose is to achieve an interdisciplinary way of stating the question. Until then no breakdown of the global question by particular methods of single disciplines ought to be attempted. Realistic variations of this ideal are also discussed.

摘要

人们普遍认为生物伦理学是一门跨学科的科学。为何如此以及这意味着什么,并不总是清晰明确或得到一致认同,而且在作者看来,其影响尚未得到充分研究。基于参与被标记为跨学科的项目,作者反思了跨学科方法,尤其是其出发点。有人认为,除非从一开始就抑制所有单一学科方法不可避免的简化,否则跨学科就无法蓬勃发展。这种努力被称为方法性悬置,理想情况下是暂时中止所有已知方法。其目的是实现一种跨学科的提问方式。在此之前,不应尝试用单一学科的特定方法对整体问题进行分解。本文还讨论了这一理想情况的现实变体。

相似文献

1
Interdisciplinary bioethics: but where do we start? A reflection of epochè as method.跨学科生物伦理学:但我们从何处开始?对作为方法的悬置的思考。
J Med Philos. 1982 Aug;7(3):275-87. doi: 10.1093/jmp/7.3.275.
2
Moral experience and ethical reflection: can ethnography reconcile them? A quandary for "the new bioethics.道德体验与伦理反思:人种志能调和二者吗?“新生物伦理学”面临的一个困境
Daedalus. 1999 Fall;128(4):69-97.
3
Bioethics and humanities: what makes us one field?生物伦理学与人文科学:是什么让我们成为一个领域?
J Med Philos. 1998 Jun;23(4):356-68. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.4.356.2576.
4
A method of reflexive balancing in a pragmatic, interdisciplinary and reflexive bioethics.一种在务实、跨学科且具有反思性的生物伦理学中进行反思平衡的方法。
Bioethics. 2014 Jul;28(6):302-12. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12018. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
5
Bioethics education: diversity and critique.
J Med Philos. 1991 Feb;16(1):1-4. doi: 10.1093/jmp/16.1.1.
6
[Interdisciplinary of bioethics: its possibility and its limits].[生物伦理学的跨学科性:其可能性与局限性]
Cuad Bioet. 2013 May-Aug;24(81):265-74.
7
Merging arts and bioethics: An interdisciplinary experiment in cultural and scientific mediation.融合艺术与生物伦理学:文化与科学调解中的跨学科实验。
Bioethics. 2017 Oct;31(8):616-630. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12391.
8
Method in bioethics: a troubled assessment.生物伦理学中的方法:一项陷入困境的评估。
J Med Philos. 1990 Apr;15(2):179-97. doi: 10.1093/jmp/15.2.179.
9
An Eastern Orthodox approach to bioethics.东正教对生物伦理学的探讨。
J Med Philos. 1993 Dec;18(6):531-48. doi: 10.1093/jmp/18.6.531.
10
Arguments at cross-purposes: moral epistemology and medical ethics.南辕北辙的争论:道德认识论与医学伦理学
J Med Ethics. 2002 Feb;28(1):28-32. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.1.28.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Realism and Empirical Bioethics: A Methodological Exposition.批判实在论与实证生物伦理学:一种方法论阐述
Health Care Anal. 2017 Sep;25(3):191-211. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0290-2.
2
Disciplining bioethics: towards a standard of methodological rigor in bioethics research.规范生物伦理学:走向生物伦理学研究方法严谨性的标准。
Account Res. 2012 May;19(3):187-207. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2012.692971.