Hoft R H, Glaser R J
N Engl J Med. 1982 Dec 30;307(27):1681-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198212303072705.
The growth of prepaid medical-care programs has caused the leaders of a number of academic medical centers to begin to have an increased interest in affiliating with or sponsoring centers in prepaid programs -- otherwise known as health-maintenance organizations (HMOs)--is motivated by a number of potential benefits. An HMO may provide an academic medical center with an additional source of patients for teaching and research; generate additional revenue; increase resources for education in primary care; increase the exposure of students, residents, and faculty to the characteristics of prepaid medical practice; and improve the delivery of health services locally. Issues of importance to the academic medical center include the pros and cons of sponsorship of, as opposed to affiliation with, an HMO and the additional costs attributable to medical education in the HMO setting. Problems may arise between HMOs and medical centers as a result of disparate styles of practice, the high cost of clinical services at the medical center, and the differing perspectives of HMO and medical-center policy makers.
预付式医疗保健计划的发展,促使一些学术医疗中心的领导开始对与预付式计划中的中心建立附属关系或提供赞助(即健康维护组织,简称HMO)产生了越来越浓厚的兴趣,这一动机源于诸多潜在益处。健康维护组织可为学术医疗中心提供额外的教学和研究患者来源;创造额外收入;增加初级保健教育资源;增加学生、住院医生和教职员工对预付式医疗实践特点的接触机会;并改善当地的医疗服务提供情况。对学术医疗中心而言,重要的问题包括赞助健康维护组织(而非与之建立附属关系)的利弊,以及在健康维护组织环境下医学教育产生的额外成本。由于医疗实践风格不同、医疗中心临床服务成本高昂,以及健康维护组织和医疗中心政策制定者观点各异,健康维护组织与医疗中心之间可能会出现问题。