Boudoulas H, Sohn Y H, O'Neill W, Brown R, Weissler A M
Am J Cardiol. 1982 Dec;50(6):1229-35. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90454-4.
In the normal population the duration of electrical systole (QT) is shorter (mean -26 +/- 13 ms, 1 standard deviation) than that of electromechanical systole (QS2), which it closely parallels throughout the range of resting heart rate. This close association prompted the hypothesis that the duration of QT may be more closely linked physiologically to QS2 than to the heart rate and hence may provide a more potent prognostic indicator than the relation of QT to heart rate. The present study was designed to test this hypothesis. On hundred stable patients 14 months after myocardial infarction were followed up an average of 43 months. Twenty patients had prolongation of QT relative to QS2 (QT greater than QS2) and 13 patients had long QT corrected for heart rate (QTc). There were 20 deaths (16 sudden). The cumulative 5 year survival rate was 35% in patients with QT greater than QS2 and 91% in patients with QT greater than or equal to QS2 (p less than 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival in patients with long QTc compared with patients with normal QTc (69 versus 82%). Univariate and multivariate analysis for the association of QT greater than QS2 with known risk factors, clinical descriptors, drug therapy, systolic time intervals (preejection period/left ventricular ejection time), and frequency of 1, 2 and 3 vessel coronary occlusive artery disease revealed that only the presence of abnormal preejection period/left ventricular ejection time added significantly to the presence of QT greater than QS2 in stratifying 5-year survival into high and low risk groups. Thus, in patients with coronary artery disease, the presence of QT greater than QS2 provides a new risk indicator that is more potent than QT corrected for heart rate.
在正常人群中,电收缩期(QT)的持续时间(平均为 -26 ± 13 毫秒,1 个标准差)比机电收缩期(QS2)短,在静息心率范围内两者密切相关。这种紧密关联促使人们提出这样的假设:QT 的持续时间在生理上可能与 QS2 的联系比与心率的联系更紧密,因此可能比 QT 与心率的关系提供更有效的预后指标。本研究旨在验证这一假设。对 100 例心肌梗死后 14 个月病情稳定的患者进行了平均 43 个月的随访。20 例患者的 QT 相对于 QS2 延长(QT 大于 QS2),13 例患者的 QT 经心率校正后延长(QTc)。有 20 例死亡(16 例猝死)。QT 大于 QS2 的患者 5 年累积生存率为 35%,QT 大于或等于 QS2 的患者为 91%(p < 0.001)。QTc 延长的患者与 QTc 正常的患者生存率无显著差异(分别为 69% 和 82%)。对 QT 大于 QS2 与已知危险因素、临床特征、药物治疗、收缩期时间间期(射血前期/左心室射血时间)以及单支、双支和三支冠状动脉闭塞性疾病的发生率之间的关联进行单因素和多因素分析发现,在将 5 年生存率分为高风险和低风险组时,只有异常的射血前期/左心室射血时间的存在能显著增加 QT 大于 QS2 对生存分层的作用。因此,在冠心病患者中,QT 大于 QS2 的存在提供了一个比经心率校正的 QT 更有效的新风险指标。