Suppr超能文献

束支传导阻滞患者中H-Q间期的价值及预防性永久起搏的作用。

Value of the H-Q interval in patients with bundle branch block and the role of prophylactic permanent pacing.

作者信息

Scheinman M M, Peters R W, Suavé M J, Desai J, Abbott J A, Cogan J, Wohl B, Williams K

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1982 Dec;50(6):1316-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90469-6.

Abstract

His bundle electrograms were obtained in 313 patients with chronic bundle branch block who were followed for a mean period of almost 3 years. The infranodal conduction time (H-Q interval) was less than 55 ms in 97 patients (Group I), 55 to 69 ms in 99 patients (Group II), and greater than or equal to 70 ms in 117 patients (Group III). There was a higher incidence of organic heart disease in patients in Group III, but the groups were otherwise comparable. On follow-up study, mortality and the incidence of sudden death were similar among the groups, but patients in Group III had a greater incidence of progression to high degree atrioventricular block (HDB) than did those in Groups I and II (14 of 117 [12%] versus 4 of 97 [4%] and 2 of 99 [2%], p less than 0.01, respectively). High degree block was found in 4 of 17 (24%) patients with an H-Q interval (H-Q) greater than or equal to 100 ms. Sixty-two patients underwent permanent prophylactic pacemaker insertion at the discretion of the referring physician and were compared with 231 patients who did not. Paced patients had a higher incidence of transient neurologic symptoms and prolonged H-Q, but the groups were otherwise comparable. On follow-up study, mortality and the incidence of sudden death were similar among the groups, but symptom relief was significantly more common among patients with pacemakers. In conclusion, in our population (1) H-Q greater than or equal to 70 ms was an independent risk factor for progression to HDB, (2) H-Q greater than or equal to 100 ms identified a subgroup at particularly high risk, and (3) prophylactic pacemakers relieved neurologic symptoms but did not prolong life.

摘要

对313例慢性束支传导阻滞患者进行了希氏束电图检查,并对其进行了平均近3年的随访。97例患者(第一组)的结下传导时间(H-Q间期)小于55毫秒,99例患者(第二组)的结下传导时间为55至69毫秒,117例患者(第三组)的结下传导时间大于或等于70毫秒。第三组患者器质性心脏病的发病率较高,但其他方面各组具有可比性。在随访研究中,各组的死亡率和猝死发生率相似,但第三组患者进展为高度房室传导阻滞(HDB)的发生率高于第一组和第二组(117例中有14例[12%],而97例中有4例[4%],99例中有2例[2%],p值分别小于0.01)。在17例H-Q间期(H-Q)大于或等于100毫秒的患者中,有4例(24%)出现高度阻滞。62例患者根据转诊医生的判断接受了永久性预防性起搏器植入,并与231例未植入起搏器的患者进行了比较。植入起搏器的患者出现短暂神经症状和H-Q间期延长的发生率较高,但其他方面各组具有可比性。在随访研究中,各组的死亡率和猝死发生率相似,但起搏器植入患者症状缓解更为常见。总之,在我们的研究人群中,(1)H-Q大于或等于70毫秒是进展为HDB的独立危险因素,(2)H-Q大于或等于100毫秒确定了一个特别高危的亚组,(3)预防性起搏器可缓解神经症状,但不能延长生命。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验