• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

束支传导阻滞患者中H-Q间期的价值及预防性永久起搏的作用。

Value of the H-Q interval in patients with bundle branch block and the role of prophylactic permanent pacing.

作者信息

Scheinman M M, Peters R W, Suavé M J, Desai J, Abbott J A, Cogan J, Wohl B, Williams K

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1982 Dec;50(6):1316-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90469-6.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(82)90469-6
PMID:7148708
Abstract

His bundle electrograms were obtained in 313 patients with chronic bundle branch block who were followed for a mean period of almost 3 years. The infranodal conduction time (H-Q interval) was less than 55 ms in 97 patients (Group I), 55 to 69 ms in 99 patients (Group II), and greater than or equal to 70 ms in 117 patients (Group III). There was a higher incidence of organic heart disease in patients in Group III, but the groups were otherwise comparable. On follow-up study, mortality and the incidence of sudden death were similar among the groups, but patients in Group III had a greater incidence of progression to high degree atrioventricular block (HDB) than did those in Groups I and II (14 of 117 [12%] versus 4 of 97 [4%] and 2 of 99 [2%], p less than 0.01, respectively). High degree block was found in 4 of 17 (24%) patients with an H-Q interval (H-Q) greater than or equal to 100 ms. Sixty-two patients underwent permanent prophylactic pacemaker insertion at the discretion of the referring physician and were compared with 231 patients who did not. Paced patients had a higher incidence of transient neurologic symptoms and prolonged H-Q, but the groups were otherwise comparable. On follow-up study, mortality and the incidence of sudden death were similar among the groups, but symptom relief was significantly more common among patients with pacemakers. In conclusion, in our population (1) H-Q greater than or equal to 70 ms was an independent risk factor for progression to HDB, (2) H-Q greater than or equal to 100 ms identified a subgroup at particularly high risk, and (3) prophylactic pacemakers relieved neurologic symptoms but did not prolong life.

摘要

对313例慢性束支传导阻滞患者进行了希氏束电图检查,并对其进行了平均近3年的随访。97例患者(第一组)的结下传导时间(H-Q间期)小于55毫秒,99例患者(第二组)的结下传导时间为55至69毫秒,117例患者(第三组)的结下传导时间大于或等于70毫秒。第三组患者器质性心脏病的发病率较高,但其他方面各组具有可比性。在随访研究中,各组的死亡率和猝死发生率相似,但第三组患者进展为高度房室传导阻滞(HDB)的发生率高于第一组和第二组(117例中有14例[12%],而97例中有4例[4%],99例中有2例[2%],p值分别小于0.01)。在17例H-Q间期(H-Q)大于或等于100毫秒的患者中,有4例(24%)出现高度阻滞。62例患者根据转诊医生的判断接受了永久性预防性起搏器植入,并与231例未植入起搏器的患者进行了比较。植入起搏器的患者出现短暂神经症状和H-Q间期延长的发生率较高,但其他方面各组具有可比性。在随访研究中,各组的死亡率和猝死发生率相似,但起搏器植入患者症状缓解更为常见。总之,在我们的研究人群中,(1)H-Q大于或等于70毫秒是进展为HDB的独立危险因素,(2)H-Q大于或等于100毫秒确定了一个特别高危的亚组,(3)预防性起搏器可缓解神经症状,但不能延长生命。

相似文献

1
Value of the H-Q interval in patients with bundle branch block and the role of prophylactic permanent pacing.束支传导阻滞患者中H-Q间期的价值及预防性永久起搏的作用。
Am J Cardiol. 1982 Dec;50(6):1316-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90469-6.
2
Electrophysiologic studies in patients with bundle branch block.束支传导阻滞患者的电生理研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983 Sep;6(5 Pt 2):1157-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1983.tb04453.x.
3
Prospective evaluation of infrahisal second-degree AV block induced by atrial pacing in the presence of chronic bundle branch block and syncope.在存在慢性束支传导阻滞和晕厥的情况下,对心房起搏诱发的希氏束下二度房室传导阻滞进行前瞻性评估。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 May;19(5):784-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03360.x.
4
[Significance of prolonged PR interval in patients with His bundle branch block, bifascicular type].[希氏束分支阻滞双分支型患者中PR间期延长的意义]
Arq Bras Cardiol. 1991 May;56(5):355-8.
5
Significance of A-H interval in patients with chronic bundle branch block. Clinical, electrophysiologic and follow-up observations.
Am J Cardiol. 1976 Feb;37(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90317-9.
6
Prognostic value of infranodal conduction time in patients with chronic bundle branch block.
Circulation. 1977 Aug;56(2):240-4. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.56.2.240.
7
The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 2. Indications for temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion.束支传导阻滞合并急性心肌梗死的临床意义。2. 临时和永久起搏器植入的指征。
Circulation. 1978 Oct;58(4):689-99. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.4.689.
8
[Permanent His-bundle pacing in patients with infra-Hisian atrioventricular block].[希氏束下房室传导阻滞患者的永久性希氏束起搏]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006 Jun;59(6):553-8.
9
Permanent His-bundle pacing in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves.人工心脏瓣膜患者的永久性希氏束起搏
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Jan;14(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
Conduction Abnormalities and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Repositionable LOTUS Device: The United Kingdom Experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用可重定位 LOTUS 装置后的传导异常和永久性起搏器植入:英国经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1247-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.044.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing Length of Hospital Stay Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后缩短住院时间
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):5433. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185433.
2
[Historical development of diagnosis of bradyarrhythmias : The early years of clinical electrophysiology in Germany].[缓慢性心律失常诊断的历史发展:德国临床电生理学的早期岁月]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2024 Mar;35(Suppl 1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/s00399-024-01006-0. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者传导障碍的预测。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 May;112(5):677-690. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02160-0. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
4
JCS/JHRS 2019 guideline on non-pharmacotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias.《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2019年心律失常非药物治疗指南》
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jun 2;37(4):709-870. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12491. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中传导障碍的发生和持续存在。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 7;57(7):695. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070695.
6
Use of Electrophysiological Studies in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.电生理研究在经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的应用
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2020 Jun 3;9(1):20-27. doi: 10.15420/aer.2019.38.3.
7
Re-evaluating the electro-vectorcardiographic criteria for left bundle branch block.重新评估左束支传导阻滞的心电向量图标准。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2019 Jul;24(4):e12644. doi: 10.1111/anec.12644. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
8
Predictors of positive electrophysiological study in patients with syncope and bundle branch block: PR interval and type of conduction disturbance.晕厥合并束支传导阻滞患者电生理检查阳性的预测因素:PR间期及传导障碍类型。
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Dec;41(12):1537-1542. doi: 10.1002/clc.23079. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
9
Association of cardiac implantable electronic devices with survival in bifascicular block and prolonged PR interval on electrocardiogram.心脏植入式电子设备与双分支阻滞及心电图PR间期延长患者生存率的关联
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Aug;52(3):335-341. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0389-0. Epub 2018 Jun 16.
10
Electrophysiological Testing for the Investigation of Bradycardias.用于缓慢性心律失常调查的电生理检查
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2017 Apr;6(1):24-28. doi: 10.15420/aer.2016:34:2.