Gold J H, Schuder J C, Stoeckle H, McDaniel W C, Moellinger D W, Roberts S A
Am J Physiol. 1982 Dec;243(6):G982-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1982.243.6.H982.
The effectiveness of up to five 50-A, 4-ms rectangular pulses (each nominally 50% successful) followed, when required, by up to six 70-A, 6-ms pulses applied at 15-s intervals in reversing ventricular fibrillation in 100-kg calves was studied in 600 episodes in which 50-A, 6-ms; 70-A, 3-ms; 70-A, 6-ms; 70-A, 12-ms; or 100-A, 6-ms prefibrillation shocks had been delivered 5 s before the induction of fibrillation and in another 600 episodes in which the prefibrillation shock was omitted. We found that 1) there was a modest adverse influence of the prefibrillation shock upon the outcome of the 50-A, 4-ms portion of the sequential shock effort; 2) The 50-A, 4-ms shocks remained reasonably successful throughout the five-shock sequence; 3) when the prefibrillation shock was omitted, the time intervals for a return of a ventricular complex and normal sinus rhythm in the postdefibrillation electrocardiogram increased rapidly with the number of shocks required for defibrillation; and 4) if defibrillation was not achieved with the five-shock sequence, a single 70-A, 6-ms shock was about 94% successful and the sequence of up to six shocks was 100% successful.
在600次发作中,研究了先给予高达五次50安培、4毫秒的矩形脉冲(每次名义成功率为50%),必要时再以15秒的间隔施加高达六次70安培、6毫秒的脉冲,对100千克小牛进行室颤逆转的效果。这600次发作中,有50次在诱发室颤前5秒给予了50安培、6毫秒;70安培、3毫秒;70安培、6毫秒;70安培、12毫秒;或100安培、6毫秒的预颤电击,另有600次发作未给予预颤电击。我们发现:1)预颤电击对连续电击过程中50安培、4毫秒部分的结果有一定的不利影响;2)在整个五次电击序列中,50安培、4毫秒的电击仍保持相当高的成功率;3)当省略预颤电击时,除颤后心电图中心室复合波恢复和正常窦性心律的时间间隔会随着除颤所需电击次数的增加而迅速增加;4)如果五次电击序列未能实现除颤,单次70安培、6毫秒的电击成功率约为94%,高达六次电击的序列成功率为100%。