Kahgee S L, Pomeroy E, Miller H R
Br J Med Psychol. 1982 Dec;55(4):319-25. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1982.tb01516.x.
Normal subjects typically categorize acquaintances on bipolar dimensions consisting of pairs of contrasting descriptive adjectives by using positive adjectives in the golden section ratio, i.e. 62 percent cent of the time. This study compared the performance of thought-disordered and non-thought-disordered schizophrenics on a similar task, using acquaintances and inanimate objects. Subjects generated six evaluatively positive figures (three acquaintances and three objects) and six negative figures (three acquaintances and three objects) and categorized them and themselves using either pole of 12 pairs of contrasting descriptive adjectives. Positive adjectives were assigned to objects 59.2 per cent and to acquaintances 62.8 per cent of the time. Overall, positive adjectives were assigned 61.0 per cent of the time. There were no differences between TD and NTD subjects. Subjects rated acquaintances positively (62.0 per cent) significantly more often than objects (P less than 0.05). Results supported the fundamental nature of the GS in interpersonal relations and the idea that schizophrenics identify with and differentiate themselves from others in the same way as normals.
正常受试者通常通过使用呈黄金分割比例（即62%的时间）的积极形容词，在由成对的对比性描述形容词组成的双极维度上对熟人进行分类。本研究比较了思维紊乱和非思维紊乱的精神分裂症患者在一项类似任务中的表现，该任务使用熟人及无生命物体。受试者生成六个评价为积极的人物（三个熟人及三个物体）和六个消极的人物（三个熟人及三个物体），并使用12对对比性描述形容词中的任一极对它们以及自己进行分类。积极形容词被用于描述物体的时间占59.2%，用于描述熟人的时间占62.8%。总体而言，积极形容词被使用的时间占61.0%。思维紊乱（TD）和非思维紊乱（NTD）受试者之间没有差异。受试者对熟人给予积极评价（62.0%）的频率显著高于对物体给予积极评价的频率（P小于0.05）。结果支持了黄金分割在人际关系中的基本性质，以及精神分裂症患者与正常人一样以相同方式认同他人并将自己与他人区分开来的观点。
