Adams-Weber J
Br J Med Psychol. 1977 Jun;50(2):173-6. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1977.tb02410.x.
This study compared the level of organization of judgements involving evaluatively positive (E+) adjectives such as kind with that of judgements involving evaluatively negative (E-) adjectives such as stupid in the Bannister-Fransella Grid Test. The grids of 275 subjects, including 43 normals, 24 thought-disordered schizophrenics, 30 non-thought-disordered schizophrenics, 50 "mixed" schizophrenics, 18 depressives, 16 neurotics, and 94 undiagnosed new admissions were examined. The organization of judgements based on E+ ones across all ten groups. These results are inconsistent with the "null hypothesis" that the grids of thought-disordered schizophrenics contain only random "error variance" since they reveal a source of systematic variation in the grids of thought-disordered schizophrenics as well as those of other populations. These data were discussed also in relation to the hypothesis that comparative judgements involving E- adjectives are more difficult than those involving E+ ones.
本研究在班尼斯特 - 弗兰塞拉网格测试中，比较了涉及评价性积极（E +）形容词（如善良）的判断组织水平与涉及评价性消极（E -）形容词（如愚蠢）的判断组织水平。研究检查了275名受试者的网格，其中包括43名正常人、24名思维紊乱的精神分裂症患者、30名非思维紊乱的精神分裂症患者、50名“混合型”精神分裂症患者、18名抑郁症患者、16名神经症患者以及94名未确诊的新入院患者。基于E +形容词的判断在所有十组中的组织情况。这些结果与“零假设”不一致，即思维紊乱的精神分裂症患者的网格仅包含随机“误差方差”，因为它们揭示了思维紊乱的精神分裂症患者以及其他人群的网格中存在系统变异的来源。这些数据还结合以下假设进行了讨论：涉及E -形容词的比较判断比涉及E +形容词的比较判断更困难。
