Cramer P, Bowen J, O'Neill M
St Bernard's Hospital, Southall, Middlesex.
Br J Psychiatry. 1992 Apr;160:481-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.160.4.481.
Videotaped social interactions were shown to a population of schizophrenics and controls who were asked to comment on the emotional state of the principal protagonist. Their free responses were subjected to a content analysis to examine which of three possible explanations of known schizophrenic inaccuracies on this task were responsible: formal thought disorder, selective avoidance of psychological factors, or perceptual/attentional deficits. Neither selective avoidance nor marked thought disorder were found to explain these errors. The schizophrenics as a group rated much the same, irrespective of clinical profile. Their judgements of personality were less clear-cut than the controls.
向一组精神分裂症患者和对照组播放了录像的社交互动内容,要求他们对主要角色的情绪状态发表评论。对他们的自由回答进行了内容分析,以检验已知精神分裂症患者在此任务上出现错误的三种可能解释中哪一种是原因:形式思维障碍、对心理因素的选择性回避或感知/注意力缺陷。研究发现,选择性回避和明显的思维障碍都不能解释这些错误。作为一个群体,精神分裂症患者的评分大致相同,与临床特征无关。他们对性格的判断不如对照组明确。