Suppr超能文献

[粪便潜血——一项比较便潜血试验和粪便隐血检测的前瞻性研究]

[Occult blood in feces--a prospective study for the comparison of Hemoccult and Fecatest].

作者信息

Beretta K R, Güller R, Singeisen M, Stalder G A

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1978 Dec 2;108(48):1905-7.

PMID:715431
Abstract

Stool samples of 150 unselected patients were tested for occult blood by the Haemoccult test and the Fecatest. The results show that the Haemoccult test is more suitable for screening for cancerous and precancerous colonic lesions than the Fecatest. Less than 10% of the patients had positive stool samples with the Haemoccult test, while bleedings lesions were subsequently found in about 2/3 of the cases. In contrast, the Fecatest was positive in 50% and in 70% after storage. These findings show clearly that the Fecatest cannot be recommended for the screening of colonic tumors.

摘要

对150例未经挑选的患者的粪便样本进行了隐血试验(Hemoccult试验)和粪便潜血检测(Fecatest)。结果表明,与粪便潜血检测相比,隐血试验更适合用于筛查结肠的癌性和癌前病变。采用隐血试验时,不到10%的患者粪便样本呈阳性,而随后约2/3的病例发现有出血性病变。相比之下,粪便潜血检测在刚检测时阳性率为50%,保存后为70%。这些结果清楚地表明,粪便潜血检测不适合用于结肠肿瘤的筛查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验