Liden C B, Nichter C A, Murphy T F
Semin Perinatol. 1982 Oct;6(4):340-52.
To effectively deal with the high-risk infant and his outcome, it would appear that clinicians and researchers must, in a sense, place themselves "at-risk." They must recognize the limitations of a reductionistic, biomedical model when applied to this population and its problems. They must move beyond this traditional model to a so-called "biopsychosocial model" which acknowledges the uncertainties of human development and its transactional character. To do so, they must also seek to break down many traditional "boundaries" that have served to inhibit a better understanding of the high-risk infant. These boundaries include those between disciplines, between clinicians and researchers, between assessment and treatment, between cost efficiency and comprehensiveness, and those between quantitative and qualitative methodologies to name a few. This process must not be one of all or none exclusion, where a uniform perspective is adopted in isolation and applied to all aspects of the problem. Rather it must be a combination and synthesis of many perspectives. In essence, the construct used to understand and study the high-risk infant and his outcome should be consistent with the transactional and multifactorial nature of the problem. These tasks are formidable and threatening to undertake, particularly when they do not always yield the type of outcomes we have been conditioned to expect: "hard" data; narrow etiologies; and successful cures. However, failure to take such "risks" would seem to impede a further understanding of the at-risk infant. The T.R.A.N.S.A.C.T. model presented here is offered as a working construct which has yet to be fully operationalized. Its perceived limitations will reflect the background, biases and perspectives of the reader. Hopefully, it will serve to stimulate those interested and involved in the high-risk infant and his outcome to modify, refine or build upon their current approaches.
为了有效应对高危婴儿及其预后问题,从某种意义上说,临床医生和研究人员似乎必须使自己置身于“风险之中”。他们必须认识到,当将还原论的生物医学模式应用于这一人群及其问题时存在局限性。他们必须超越这种传统模式,转向一种所谓的“生物心理社会模式”,该模式承认人类发展的不确定性及其相互作用的性质。要做到这一点,他们还必须设法打破许多传统的“界限”,这些界限阻碍了对高危婴儿的更好理解。这些界限包括学科之间、临床医生和研究人员之间、评估与治疗之间、成本效益与全面性之间以及定量和定性方法之间等等。这个过程不应是全有或全无的排他过程,即孤立地采用统一观点并将其应用于问题的所有方面。相反,它必须是多种观点的结合与综合。从本质上讲,用于理解和研究高危婴儿及其预后的构建应该与问题的相互作用和多因素性质相一致。这些任务艰巨且具有挑战性,尤其是当它们并不总是产生我们习惯期望的那种结果时:“硬”数据、狭窄的病因和成功的治愈方法。然而,不冒这样的“风险”似乎会阻碍对高危婴儿的进一步理解。这里提出的T.R.A.N.S.A.C.T.模型是作为一种尚未完全实施的工作构建提供的。其明显的局限性将反映读者的背景、偏见和观点。希望它将有助于激发那些对高危婴儿及其预后感兴趣并参与其中的人修改、完善或在其当前方法的基础上进行构建。