Dietrich M C, Crowley J A
J Allied Health. 1982 Nov;11(4):248-60.
Allied health education program directors must often deal with a selective admissions policy that results in large numbers of rejected applicants. This study reports the national outcomes of a 1978 survey of candidate selection practices in four baccalaureate level and seven associate degree level allied health disciplines. A total response rate of 53% (451 of 848 programs) was achieved. The survey evaluated the content of the selection process (types of selection variables and weighting of data sources) and the process or mechanics of applicant selection (selection committees, interviewing, data quantification, and evaluation of the process). The applicants' academic records and interview outcomes were primary data sources. Few programs conducted evaluation of their admissions activities. Physical therapy and dental hygiene programs, the most competitive curricula in terms of applicant numbers at each educational level, evidenced the greatest degree of structure in student selection. The authors propose guidelines designed to address some of the admissions weaknesses revealed by the survey.
联合健康职业教育项目主任常常必须应对一项选拔录取政策,该政策导致大量申请者被拒。本研究报告了1978年对四个学士学位层次和七个副学士学位层次联合健康学科的候选人选拔实践进行的全国性调查结果。总回复率达到了53%(848个项目中的451个)。该调查评估了选拔过程的内容(选拔变量类型和数据源权重)以及申请者选拔的过程或机制(选拔委员会、面试、数据量化和过程评估)。申请者的学术记录和面试结果是主要数据源。很少有项目对其录取活动进行评估。物理治疗和口腔卫生项目,在每个教育层次的申请者数量方面是竞争最激烈的课程,在学生选拔方面表现出最大程度的结构化。作者提出了旨在解决调查中揭示的一些录取弱点的指导方针。