Schemper M
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1982 Nov 26;94(22):604-9.
The choice of an adequate randomization procedure, the organization of the randomization process and its correct implementation are questions that may influence the quality of a controlled therapeutic trial. Starting with a brief critical review of randomization procedures now available, this paper presents in greater detail one method which is thought to be optimal for clinic trials of typical sample sizes. The "adaptive randomization" procedure of Pocock and Simon [3] keeps all 2-8 factors of prognostic importance in satisfactory balance-as has been confirmed by trials in the past 4 years. An interactive computer program, RANDOM, is introduced, whereby easy and safe use of the procedure is enabled via a video terminal. Furthermore, standardized recording of the randomization process by a clerk for medical documentation in the central randomization office is described. The possibility of randomizing multi-factorial trials and the admissibility of eliminating already randomized patients from a trial are discussed. The working group on documentation and biometry of the 1st Department of Surgery, Vienna University Medical School, offers the program to any centres that may be interested and is also willing to undertake randomizations (by phone) for clinical trials within Austria.
选择合适的随机化程序、随机化过程的组织及其正确实施,这些问题可能会影响对照治疗试验的质量。本文首先对现有的随机化程序进行简要批判性回顾,然后更详细地介绍一种被认为对于典型样本量的临床试验最为理想的方法。波科克和西蒙[3]提出的“适应性随机化”程序能使所有2至8个具有预后重要性的因素保持令人满意的平衡——过去4年的试验已证实这一点。本文介绍了一个交互式计算机程序RANDOM,通过视频终端可方便、安全地使用该程序。此外,还描述了由中央随机化办公室的一名职员对随机化过程进行标准化记录,用于医疗文档。讨论了多因素试验随机化的可能性以及从试验中剔除已随机分组患者的可接受性。维也纳大学医学院第一外科记录与生物统计学工作组向任何感兴趣的中心提供该程序,并且也愿意(通过电话)为奥地利境内的临床试验进行随机分组。