Armstrong P W, Watts D G
Biomedicine. 1981 Sep;34(2):65-6.
Conventional blind randomized trials involve obtaining consent for treatment prior to randomization into control or treatment groups. When the trial is of necessity an open one, obtaining consent to treatment and then assigning the patient to a control group may lead to undesirable consequences. When consent is required prior to randomization, inability to obtain it diminishes both control and treatment numbers. Obtaining consent after randomization enhances the power of the study since refusal affects only treatment numbers thus making more efficient use of patient material. We propose to analyze the outcome of patients allocated to treatment, but refusing experimental therapy, as a separate group. Comparison of this group with the control population will permit validation of the efficacy of the randomization process and allow testing of the hypothesis that refusers of consent react the same as the control population. If no difference occurs we propose that the refuser and control groups be combined and compared with those patients who receive experimental treatment.
传统的盲法随机试验涉及在随机分配到对照组或治疗组之前获得治疗同意书。当试验必然是开放性试验时,在获得治疗同意书后再将患者分配到对照组可能会导致不良后果。在随机化之前需要获得同意书时,无法获得同意书会减少对照组和治疗组的样本量。在随机化之后获得同意书可提高研究效能,因为拒绝只会影响治疗组的样本量,从而更有效地利用患者资源。我们建议将分配到治疗组但拒绝实验性治疗的患者的结果作为一个单独的组进行分析。将该组与对照人群进行比较将验证随机化过程的有效性,并允许检验拒绝同意者与对照人群反应相同的假设。如果没有差异,我们建议将拒绝者组和对照组合并,并与接受实验性治疗的患者进行比较。