• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哺乳动物中的生殖细胞敏感性。

Germ-cell sensitivity in mammals.

作者信息

Adler I D

出版信息

Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;109:137-48.

PMID:7167539
Abstract

The differences in mammalian germ-cell sensitivity have been studied with a number of mutagenic agents using both chromosomal aberrations and point mutations as genetic endpoints. I have tried to give a survey on the present knowledge. Several conclusions can be drawn at present: 1. In spermatogenesis the sensitivity to mutation induction differs between various post-spermatogonial stages and spermatogonia. 2. Heritable structural chromosomal changes are primarily recovered from post-spermatogonial germ cells. The sensitivity pattern is similar in dominant lethal and heritable translocation experiments. The effect recovered from spermatogonia is near zero. 3. Structurally related chemicals show a difference in their spermatogenic response. The most obvious example gave the induction of specific locus mutations by ENU and MNU. 4. Since too little information is available it seems prudent to assume that oocytes and spermatogonia may show similar sensitivity so that in risk estimates effects on female germ cells cannot be neglected. The final result from the previous discussion must be that the limitations of knowledge are obvious, they lie in the limited number of chemicals tested in mammalian germ-cell assays. A larger data base of mammalian germ-cell response to chemical mutagens is urgently needed.

摘要

利用多种诱变剂,以染色体畸变和点突变作为遗传终点,对哺乳动物生殖细胞的敏感性差异进行了研究。我试图对目前的知识进行综述。目前可以得出几个结论:1. 在精子发生过程中,精原细胞后期的各个阶段与精原细胞对突变诱导的敏感性不同。2. 可遗传的染色体结构变化主要来自精原细胞后期的生殖细胞。在显性致死和可遗传易位实验中,敏感性模式相似。从精原细胞中恢复的效应接近零。3. 结构相关的化学物质在生精反应上存在差异。最明显的例子是ENU和MNU诱导特定基因座突变。4. 由于可用信息太少,谨慎的做法似乎是假定卵母细胞和精原细胞可能表现出相似的敏感性,因此在风险评估中,对雌性生殖细胞的影响不能被忽视。先前讨论的最终结果必然是,知识的局限性显而易见,它们这些这些这些局限性在于在哺乳动物生殖细胞试验中测试的化学物质数量有限。迫切需要一个关于哺乳动物生殖细胞对化学诱变剂反应的更大的数据库。

相似文献

1
Germ-cell sensitivity in mammals.哺乳动物中的生殖细胞敏感性。
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;109:137-48.
2
The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.果蝇检测结果作为接触致癌物指标的情况。
IARC Sci Publ. 1999(146):427-70.
3
Gender differences in the induction of chromosomal aberrations and gene mutations in rodent germ cells.啮齿动物生殖细胞中染色体畸变和基因突变诱导的性别差异。
Environ Res. 2007 May;104(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.08.010. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
4
Unscheduled DNA synthesis assay in mammalian spermatogenic cells: an update.
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2000;36(4):255-65.
5
Germ cell mutations in mice.小鼠中的生殖细胞突变。
IARC Sci Publ. 1989(96):207-19.
6
The measurement of induced genetic change in mammalian germ cells.哺乳动物生殖细胞中诱导基因变化的测量。
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;817:335-75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-421-6_16.
7
Gender effects on the incidence of aneuploidy in mammalian germ cells.性别对哺乳动物生殖细胞非整倍体发生率的影响。
Environ Res. 2007 May;104(1):46-69. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
8
[Mutagenic effect of nitrosodimethylurea in male mice. Induction of dominant lethal mutations and chromosome aberrations in germ cells; genotype influence on the clastogenic effect in bone marrow cells].[亚硝基二甲脲对雄性小鼠的诱变作用。生殖细胞中显性致死突变和染色体畸变的诱导;基因型对骨髓细胞致断裂效应的影响]
Genetika. 1997 Apr;33(4):524-31.
9
Differential sensitivities of spermatogonial and postspermatogonial cell stages of the mouse to induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis by ethyl- and methyl-nitrosourea.小鼠精原细胞和精原细胞后阶段对乙基和甲基亚硝基脲诱导的非定标DNA合成的敏感性差异
Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 1999;19(5):339-51.
10
O-ethylthymidine adducts are the most relevant damages for mutation induced by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in female germ cells of Drosophila melanogaster.O-乙基胸苷加合物是N-乙基-N-亚硝基脲诱导黑腹果蝇雌性生殖细胞发生突变的最相关损伤。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2002;40(2):143-52. doi: 10.1002/em.10101.