Kamon E, Kiser D, Pytel J L
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1982 Nov;43(11):853-7. doi: 10.1080/15298668291410684.
Dynamic and static strength measurements were compared respectively to maximal actual lifting and to a static lifting strength of 228 male steelmill workers. The strength tests were reasonably correlated with the lifting measurements. The dynamic strength test was the simplest, the least time consuming, revealing one to one ratio with the maximal actual lift and was not perceived as an exerting maneuver. Therefore, when matching between the job and a worker is desirable, it is suggested to use the dynamic strength test as a predictor for lifting capacity.
分别对228名男性钢铁厂工人的动态和静态力量测量结果与最大实际举力和静态举力进行了比较。力量测试与举力测量结果具有合理的相关性。动态力量测试是最简单、最省时的，与最大实际举力呈一对一的比例关系，且不被视为一种费力的动作。因此，当需要对工作和工人进行匹配时，建议使用动态力量测试作为举力能力的预测指标。
