Suppr超能文献

基于系统文献检索对与搬运、推和拉相关的特定职业需求进行定义和评估。

Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

作者信息

Bos J, Kuijer P P F M, Frings-Dresen M H W

机构信息

Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2002 Dec;59(12):800-6. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.12.800.

Abstract

AIMS

(1) To find a universal strategy for the identification of specific demands of a job or task, focusing on occupations in which there may be an increased risk for health complaints owing to these specific demands. (2) To select reliable and valid tests concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling, which consider the relation between occupational work demands and the assessment of the maximally acceptable load on an individual level.

METHODS

Literature search was performed using Medline (1988 to May 2001), Embase (1966 to May 2001), and NIOSHTIC (1971-98).

RESULTS

No universal strategy was found for the definition of specific occupational demands. Therefore a "three step strategy" was formulated for defining specific occupational demands in a job or a task in order to prevent health complaints on an individual level. Many tests were found in the literature concerning lifting, but only a few concerning pushing and pulling. None of the tests concerning pushing, pulling, or lifting considered the relation between work demands and the assessment of the maximally acceptable load on an individual level. Furthermore, none of the tests met the criteria of reliability and prognostic value for musculoskeletal complaints completely. Only for the prognostic value of relative strength capacity tests concerning pushing pulling and lifting, did there appear to be limited proof for the development of musculoskeletal complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, for the prevention of work related health complaints, it can be suggested that more attention should be paid to: (1) the definition of specific occupational demands; (2) the assessment of specific occupational demands; and (3) the quality of tests for specific occupational demands.

摘要

目的

(1)寻找一种通用策略,用于识别工作或任务的特定需求,重点关注因这些特定需求而可能增加健康问题风险的职业。(2)选择关于提举、推和拉的可靠且有效的测试,这些测试要考虑职业工作需求与个体层面最大可接受负荷评估之间的关系。

方法

使用医学在线数据库(1988年至2001年5月)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1966年至2001年5月)和美国国家职业安全与健康研究所数据库(1971 - 98年)进行文献检索。

结果

未找到用于定义特定职业需求的通用策略。因此,制定了一个“三步策略”来定义工作或任务中的特定职业需求,以在个体层面预防健康问题。文献中发现了许多关于提举的测试,但关于推和拉的测试很少。关于推、拉或提举的测试均未考虑工作需求与个体层面最大可接受负荷评估之间的关系。此外,没有一项测试完全符合肌肉骨骼疾病的可靠性和预测价值标准。仅对于与推、拉和提举相关的相对力量能力测试的预测价值,似乎有有限的证据表明其与肌肉骨骼疾病的发生有关。

结论

一般而言,为预防与工作相关的健康问题,建议应更多关注:(1)特定职业需求的定义;(2)特定职业需求的评估;(3)特定职业需求测试的质量。

相似文献

5
Pushing and pulling in association with low back and shoulder complaints.
Occup Environ Med. 2002 Oct;59(10):696-702. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.10.696.
6
Are pushing and pulling work-related risk factors for upper extremity symptoms? A systematic review of observational studies.
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Nov;71(11):788-95. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101837. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
7
Biomechanically determined hand force limits protecting the low back during occupational pushing and pulling tasks.
Ergonomics. 2018 Jun;61(6):853-865. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1417643. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
Matching FCE activities and work demands: an explorative study.
J Occup Rehabil. 2006 Sep;16(3):469-83. doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9027-2.
10
Causal assessment of occupational lifting and low back pain: results of a systematic review.
Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):554-66. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.033.

引用本文的文献

3
Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups.
PLoS One. 2016 May 2;11(5):e0154073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154073. eCollection 2016.
5
6
7
Are performance-based measures predictive of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 Feb;85(2):109-23. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0659-y. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
8
Cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure: a brief review and recommendations.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010 May;12(3):223-9. doi: 10.1007/s11886-010-0100-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychophysical modelling of lifting capacity of Chinese males using strength variables.
Appl Ergon. 1993 Aug;24(4):251-7. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90459-m.
3
Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review.
Occup Environ Med. 2000 Jul;57(7):433-42. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.7.433.
4
Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC lift capacity test on a previously injured population.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 1;25(11):1405-12. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00013.
5
Physical risk factors for neck pain.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Feb;26(1):7-19. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.504.
7
Functional capacity evaluation.
Phys Ther. 2000 Jan;80(1):110-2.
9
Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Oct;25(5):387-403. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.451.
10
Validity of the dictionary of occupational titles residual functional capacity battery.
Clin J Pain. 1999 Jun;15(2):102-10. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199906000-00006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验