van Eys J
Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1982 Winter;4(4):419-23.
Recent discussions in the public press had multiple overtones indicating that there are major ethical problems in the "war on cancer", especially in pediatric oncology. Several factors have contributed to the current dilemma: the quest for a cure by society, and the patient's hope to be cured, are often not compatible; research has become a mode of care at the expense of compromising scientific rigor; and a generation of new oncologists--who do not understand the basic precepts of science--has begun practice. Uncertainty of outcome is an unavoidable consequence of prospective randomized trials, forcing patients to rely totally on the objective tools of medicine. This destroys a major principle of medicine, namely that patient and doctor alike must have faith in the method of care, in the outcome, and in each other. It is nearly impossible to be a healer and a researcher without encountering major ethical conflicts. When the separateness of care and research are again recognized, the inherent ethical absurdity that is now unknowingly espoused will no longer be perpetuated.
近期公众媒体上的讨论有多重弦外之音,表明“抗癌之战”存在重大伦理问题,尤其是在儿科肿瘤学领域。有几个因素导致了当前的困境:社会对治愈的追求与患者治愈的希望往往不相容;研究已成为一种治疗方式,却以牺牲科学严谨性为代价;而一代不理解科学基本准则的新肿瘤学家已开始行医。结果的不确定性是前瞻性随机试验不可避免的后果,这迫使患者完全依赖医学的客观工具。这破坏了医学的一项主要原则,即患者和医生都必须对治疗方法、结果以及彼此抱有信心。几乎不可能在不遭遇重大伦理冲突的情况下同时成为治疗者和研究者。当再次认识到治疗与研究的分离时,目前在不知不觉中所支持的内在伦理荒谬就不会再延续下去。