• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症临床试验中的伦理问题。

Ethical issues in cancer clinical trials.

作者信息

Kardinal C G

机构信息

Ochsner CCOP, New Orleans.

出版信息

J La State Med Soc. 1994 Aug;146(8):359-61.

PMID:7930868
Abstract

Prospective randomized trial is the gold standard in clinical research. Randomized trials tend to reduce and even eliminate investigator and patient bias. A poorly-designed or improperly randomized study involving human subjects that will not or cannot answer a scientific question is by definition unethical. However, a well-designed clinical trial is not inherently ethical. Physicians involved in a randomized trial must make the intellectually honest admission that the best therapy for the individual's disease is not yet known. The ultimate protection for human subjects who volunteer to participate in clinical trials is the responsible investigator himself. In patients with advanced cancer there are three primary factors motivating participation: hope that the new treatment will offer a better chance for controlling disease; altruism that even if the treatment did not help them as an individual it might ultimately help others; and trust that the physician would not recommend that the patient enter investigational therapy unless he thought it might be helpful.

摘要

前瞻性随机试验是临床研究的金标准。随机试验往往会减少甚至消除研究者和患者的偏倚。一项设计不佳或随机不当的涉及人类受试者的研究,如果无法或不能回答科学问题,从定义上讲就是不道德的。然而,一项设计良好的临床试验本身并不一定合乎道德。参与随机试验的医生必须诚实地承认,针对个体疾病的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。对自愿参加临床试验的人类受试者的最终保护是负责任的研究者本人。在晚期癌症患者中,有三个主要因素促使他们参与:希望新治疗能提供更好的控制疾病的机会;利他主义,即即使治疗对他们个人没有帮助,但最终可能会帮助其他人;以及信任医生不会建议患者接受试验性治疗,除非他认为这可能会有帮助。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues in cancer clinical trials.癌症临床试验中的伦理问题。
J La State Med Soc. 1994 Aug;146(8):359-61.
2
A response to a purported ethical difficulty with randomized clinical trials involving cancer patients.对一项涉及癌症患者的随机临床试验中所谓伦理难题的回应。
J Clin Ethics. 1992 Fall;3(3):231-4.
3
Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research.将研究作为治疗的一项要求:为何我们有时应允许医生向患者施压以使其参与研究。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Sep-Oct;35(5):20-8.
4
"Just Another Statistic".“只是又一个统计数字”
Oncologist. 1998;3(3):III-IV.
5
Trust, The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research.信任,当代生物医学研究的脆弱基石。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Sep-Oct;26(5):25-9.
6
Ethical difficulties with randomized clinical trials involving cancer patients: examples from the field of gynecologic oncology.涉及癌症患者的随机临床试验中的伦理困境:来自妇科肿瘤学领域的实例
J Clin Ethics. 1992 Fall;3(3):193-5.
7
How to resolve an ethical dilemma concerning randomized clinical trials.如何解决关于随机临床试验的伦理困境。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):691-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410912.
8
Leaving therapy to chance.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1983 Aug;13(4):40-7.
9
The ethics of scientific investigation involving humans.涉及人类的科学研究伦理。
Riv Ital Pediatr. 1989 Jun;15(3):223-34.
10
Noncompliance in AIDS research.艾滋病研究中的不依从性。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Sep-Oct;20(5):24-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy.接受或拒绝参与癌症治疗随机临床试验的原因。
Br J Cancer. 2000 Jun;82(11):1783-8. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1142.