Kempley S T, Morton J
Br J Psychol. 1982 Nov;73(Pt 4):441-54. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01826.x.
The experiment examines the effects of relatively long-term (10-40 minutes) priming on the recognition of spoken words presented in noise. The focus of the experiment was the extent to which the priming was lexical (i.e. whole word), morphological or physical. First, no priming was found for physically related words. Thus 'deflecting' spoken clearly in the pre-training task had no effect on the identification of 'reflecting' in the test phase. Second, there was very strong facilitation from a word with a regular inflectional relationship to the test word. Thus the word 'reflected' facilitated recognition of 'reflecting' almost as much as prior experience of 'reflecting' itself and, when responses were scored in terms of the root morpheme, counting 'reflect', 'reflects' and 'reflected' etc. as being correct, the morphemic effect was the same in the two cases. That this was a structural and not a semantic effect was shown by the complete lack of facilitation between irregularly related words such as 'held/holding', 'man/men', 'lost/loses'. These data suggest that there is a morphological/structural level of analysis which is pre-semantic, at which these long-term facilitation effects take place. They also pose a challenge to the cohort theory of word recognition.
该实验考察了相对长期(10 - 40分钟)的启动对噪声中呈现的口语单词识别的影响。实验的重点在于启动在多大程度上是词汇性的(即整个单词)、形态学的还是物理性的。首先,未发现与物理相关的单词存在启动效应。因此,在预训练任务中清晰说出的“deflecting”对测试阶段“reflecting”的识别没有影响。其次,一个与测试单词具有规则屈折关系的单词会产生很强的促进作用。因此,单词“reflected”对“reflecting”识别的促进作用几乎与“reflecting”本身的先前经验相同,并且当根据词根语素对反应进行评分时,将“reflect”“reflects”和“reflected”等视为正确,这两种情况下的语素效应是相同的。像“held/holding”“man/men”“lost/loses”等不规则相关单词之间完全没有促进作用,这表明这是一种结构而非语义效应。这些数据表明存在一个语义前的形态学/结构分析层面,这些长期促进效应在此层面发生。它们也对单词识别的词群理论提出了挑战。