Haber L R, Haber R N
Am J Psychol. 1982 Fall;95(3):409-19.
To demonstrate an interfering effect of subvocal articulation on otherwise silent reading, college-student subjects were asked to repeatedly read, either silently or aloud, both tongue-twister sentences and control sentences matched for syntactic complexity, syllable count, and sentential stress pattern. A technique was developed to measure the amount of time needed for each repetition of a sentence whether done silently or aloud. A significant difference in reading time for tongue twisters as compared to their matched controls was found for both silent as well as out-loud reading. A variety of different kinds of articulatory errors occurred in the oral repetitions, and the number of such errors was highly correlated with oral reading time. While errors could not be measured in silent reading, this correlation suggested that comparable articulatory disturbances accounted for the slower time to silently repeat tongue twisters.
为了证明默读时的默读发音对阅读的干扰作用，研究人员要求大学生受试者反复默读或朗读绕口令句子和句法复杂性、音节数和句子重音模式相匹配的对照句子。研究人员开发了一种技术来测量每个句子无论是默读还是朗读时每次重复所需的时间。结果发现，无论是默读还是朗读，绕口令的阅读时间与匹配的对照句子相比都存在显著差异。在口头重复中出现了各种不同类型的发音错误，并且这些错误的数量与口头阅读时间高度相关。虽然默读时无法测量错误，但这种相关性表明，类似的发音干扰导致默读绕口令的时间变慢。
