Suppr超能文献

医学中患者价值观的衡量。

The measurement of patients' values in medicine.

作者信息

Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland H J, Tibshirani R, Ciampi A, Till J E, Boyd N F

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1982 Winter;2(4):449-62. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8200200407.

Abstract

The standard gamble, derived from decision theory, is considered a criterion method for obtaining patients' values for different health states. In this method, a rater's value for a health state is obtained by determining, in a hypothetical setting, his readiness to remain in that state or take a risky choice with different outcomes of known value. According to the expected utility criterion, a rater's utility or value for a particular state should not be influenced by changes in the gamble outcomes. The standard gamble was used to obtain 64 patients' judgments of a set of health states, first with the outcomes of perfect health or death, and subsequently with other health states as outcomes. The changes in gamble outcomes significantly influenced reported values for health states, indicating that the standard gamble is internally inconsistent. This observation poses a major limitation to its use as a value measurement method in medicine.

摘要

标准博弈法源自决策理论,被视为获取患者对不同健康状态估值的一种标准方法。在该方法中,通过在假设情境下确定评估者是愿意维持该健康状态还是选择具有不同已知价值结果的冒险选项,来得出评估者对某一健康状态的估值。根据预期效用标准,评估者对特定状态的效用或价值不应受博弈结果变化的影响。采用标准博弈法让64名患者对一组健康状态进行判断,先是以完全健康或死亡作为结果,随后以其他健康状态作为结果。博弈结果的变化显著影响了所报告的健康状态价值,这表明标准博弈法在内部是不一致的。这一观察结果对其作为医学价值测量方法的应用构成了重大限制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验