Suppr超能文献

评估镇痛合剂的方法学考量:对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)与氢可酮用于产后疼痛

Methodological considerations in the evaluation of analgesic combinations: acetaminophen (paracetamol) and hydrocodone in postpartum pain.

作者信息

Beaver W T, McMillan D

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 Oct;10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):215S-223S.

Abstract

1 In a double-blind study, 108 postpartum patients received single oral doses of either placebo, acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1000 mg, hydrocodone 10 mg, the combination of acetaminophen plus hydrocodone, or codeine 60 mg. 2 In the 2X2 factorial analysis, both the acetaminophen and hydrocodone effects were statistically significant, whereas the interaction contrast was not. This indicates that the analgesic effect of the combination represents the additive effect of its constituents and is consistent with the assumption that these constituents are producing analgesia by different mechanisms. 3 Although significantly superior to placebo, codeine seemed to be inferior to the other treatments. 4 Compared with placebo, both codeine and hydrocodone (centrally acting narcotics) seemed relatively more effective in uterine cramp than episiotomy pain; the reverse seemed true with acetaminophen (a peripherally acting analgesic). 5 Some methodological implications for the evaluation of analgesic combinations are discussed.

摘要
  1. 在一项双盲研究中,108名产后患者接受了单次口服剂量的安慰剂、1000毫克对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)、10毫克氢可酮、对乙酰氨基酚加 氢可酮的组合或60毫克可待因。2. 在2×2析因分析中,对乙酰氨基酚和氢可酮的作用均具有统计学意义,而交互对比则无统计学意义。这表明该组合的镇痛作用代表了其成分的相加作用,并且与这些成分通过不同机制产生镇痛作用的假设一致。3. 尽管可待因明显优于安慰剂,但似乎不如其他治疗方法。4. 与安慰剂相比,可待因和氢可酮(中枢性麻醉药)在缓解子宫绞痛方面似乎比对侧切口疼痛相对更有效;对乙酰氨基酚(外周性镇痛药)的情况似乎相反。5. 讨论了评估镇痛组合的一些方法学意义。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Relief of pain due to uterine cramping/involution after birth.产后因子宫痉挛/复旧引起的疼痛缓解。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):CD004908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004908.pub3.
7
The clinical assessment of analgesic drugs.镇痛药的临床评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1981 Apr;11(4):319-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1981.tb01128.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical pharmacology of analgesics. 1. A method of assaying analgesic effect.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1960 Mar-Apr;1:163-74. doi: 10.1002/cpt196012163.
2
Mild analgesics. A review of their clinical pharmacology. II.轻度镇痛药。其临床药理学综述。II.
Am J Med Sci. 1966 May;251(5):576-99 concl. doi: 10.1097/00000441-196605000-00012.
3
Mild analgesics. A review of their clinical pharmacology.
Am J Med Sci. 1965 Nov;250(5):577-604 contd.
6
Acetaminophen versus propoxyphene hydrochloride for relief of pain in episiotomy patients.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1973 Jul;13(7):251-63. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1973.tb00265.x.
10
A model to evaluate mild analgesics in oral surgery outpatients.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976 Aug;20(2):241-50. doi: 10.1002/cpt1976202241.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验