Aas K, Leegaard J, Aukrust L, Grimmer O
Allergy. 1980 Jul;35(5):443-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1980.tb01791.x.
Extracts of five common atmospheric moulds (Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Mucor and Penicillium) obtained from different manufacturers were compared by means of skin prick testing and, partly, with the radioallergosorbent test. Considerable differences were found between the extracts with respect to positive tests found in mould-allergic individuals and controls. A purified allergen preparation of Cladosporium herbarum was superior to the crude allergen extracts. The results suggest that the allergen contents of the extract differed both with respect to total allergenic potency and to allergenic composition.
通过皮肤点刺试验,并部分采用放射变应原吸附试验,对从不同制造商处获得的五种常见大气霉菌(链格孢属、曲霉属、枝孢属、毛霉属和青霉属)提取物进行了比较。在霉菌过敏个体和对照组中,提取物在阳性试验方面存在显著差异。一种纯化的草本枝孢菌变应原制剂优于粗制变应原提取物。结果表明,提取物的变应原含量在总变应原效力和变应原组成方面均有所不同。