Suppr超能文献

静息和运动时通过二氧化碳重呼吸法与直接菲克法测定的心输出量比较。

Comparison of cardiac output determined by a carbon dioxide-rebreathing and direct Fick method at rest and during exercise.

作者信息

Reybrouck T, Amery A, Billiet L, Fagard R, Stijns H

出版信息

Clin Sci Mol Med. 1978 Nov;55(5):445-52. doi: 10.1042/cs0550445.

Abstract
  1. To study the validity of a CO2-rebreathing method at rest and during graded exercise, cardiac output was measured simultaneously on 59 occasions in 16 subjects with normal pulmonary function with the CO2-rebreathing method and the direct Fick method for oxygen. The correlation coefficient between the results of both methods was significantly higher during exercise than at rest. 2. No systematic difference was shown between (a-v)CO2 content difference determined on whole blood and end-tidal gas, which justified the exclusion of a correction factor for blood to alveolar gas PCO2 gradients. 3. In the calculation of cardiac output by the direct Fick method for CO2 and by CO2 rebreathing, a standard CO2 dissociation curve was preferred to a synthetic CO2 dissociation curve, constructed by allowance for changes in haemoglobin concentration, pH and oxygen saturation. The latter curve tended to increase values for cardiac output and induced a large dispersion around the line of identity, when compared with simultaneous cardiac output estimates by the direct Fick method for oxygen.
摘要
  1. 为研究静息和分级运动时二氧化碳重呼吸法的有效性,对16名肺功能正常的受试者在59个不同场合同时采用二氧化碳重呼吸法和直接Fick氧耗量法测量心输出量。两种方法的结果之间的相关系数在运动时显著高于静息时。2. 全血与潮气末气体测定的(a-v)CO₂含量差未显示出系统性差异,这证明无需校正血液至肺泡气体PCO₂梯度的校正因子。3. 在通过二氧化碳直接Fick法和二氧化碳重呼吸法计算心输出量时,与根据血红蛋白浓度、pH值和氧饱和度变化构建的合成二氧化碳解离曲线相比,标准二氧化碳解离曲线更可取。与通过直接Fick氧耗量法同时估计的心输出量相比,后一种曲线往往会使心输出量值增加,并导致在一致性线上出现较大离散度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验