Ohlsson J, Wranne B
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;55(5):538-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00421650.
A one-step CO2 rebreathing method for the determination of cardiac output and stroke volume (SV) has been evaluated by comparison with the direct Fick technique during recumbent exercise (10-90 W) in 13 patients. In an initial analysis, the influence of different rebreathing times and of correction for haemoglobin concentration was studied. The best correlation with the direct Fick technique was obtained with the longest analysis time, i.e. 21 s, and correction for variations in haemoglobin concentration further improved the correlation. Consequently, an analysis time of 21 s and correction for haemoglobin have been used. At low cardiac outputs, the CO2-rebreathing method overestimated the flow compared to the Fick technique. The correlation between the methods, however, was so good that a valid estimate of cardiac output could be obtained from the CO2 rebreathing method with appropriate corrections (Cardiac output, CO2 method = 2.7 + 0.77. Cardiac output, Fick; r = 0.91; Residual Standard deviation (SD res) = 0.77 l X min-1). Stroke volumes measured with the CO2 rebreathing method did not differ significantly from those obtained with the direct Fick technique, although there was a tendency to overestimate stroke volume with the CO2 rebreathing method (SV, CO2 method = 12 + 0.89 X SV, Fick; r = 0.82; SD res = 11 ml).
通过与直接Fick技术对比,对13例患者在卧位运动(10 - 90瓦)期间采用一步式二氧化碳重呼吸法测定心输出量和每搏输出量(SV)进行了评估。在初步分析中,研究了不同重呼吸时间以及血红蛋白浓度校正的影响。分析时间最长即21秒时,与直接Fick技术的相关性最佳,对血红蛋白浓度变化进行校正进一步改善了相关性。因此,采用了21秒的分析时间并对血红蛋白进行校正。在心输出量较低时,与Fick技术相比,二氧化碳重呼吸法高估了血流量。然而,两种方法之间的相关性非常好,通过适当校正,二氧化碳重呼吸法能够有效估计心输出量(心输出量,二氧化碳法 = 2.7 + 0.77×心输出量,Fick法;r = 0.91;剩余标准差(SD res)= 0.77升/分钟)。用二氧化碳重呼吸法测得的每搏输出量与直接Fick技术测得的每搏输出量相比无显著差异,不过二氧化碳重呼吸法有高估每搏输出量的趋势(每搏输出量,二氧化碳法 = 12 + 0.89×每搏输出量,Fick法;r = 0.82;SD res = 11毫升)。