Suppr超能文献

重症患者的血清胶体渗透压及胶体渗透压与流体静压之差

Serum oncotic pressure and oncotic-hydrostatic pressure differences in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Sise M J, Shackford S R, Peters R M, Virgilio R W

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1982 Jun;61(6):496-8.

PMID:7200738
Abstract

The possible influence of serum colloid oncotic pressure (COP) and the gradient between COP and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (COP-PCWP) on respiratory insufficiency and survival was studied prospectively in 77 critically ill surgical patients by daily simultaneous measurements of COP, PCWP, and intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt). Mean ages of survivors (N = 51) and nonsurvivors (n = 26) were 46 +/- 3 years (survivors) and 58 +/- 4 years (nonsurvivors), respectively (p less than 0.01). Lowest value of COP was similar in survivors (15 +/- 1 torr) and in nonsurvivors (14 +/- 1 torr). Lowest value of COP-PCWP in survivors was 3 +/- 1 torr and -1 +/- 2 torr in nonsurvivors (p less than 0.05). The difference in COP-PCWP was secondary to a significantly greater PCWP in nonsurvivors (16 +/- 1 torr) than in survivors (12 +/- 1 torr) (p less than 0.01). For each patient, Qs/Qt measured at the time of lowest measured COP was not significantly different between survivors and nonsurvivors (0.18 +/- 0.01) in survivors and 0.20 +/- 0.01 in nonsurvivors) and measured at lowest COP-PCWP (0.18 +/- 0.01 in survivors, and 0.21 +/- 0.01 in nonsurvivors). No correlation was found between either lowest COP or lowest COP-PCWP and Qs/Qt. Progressive respiratory insufficiency was not a dominant factor in determining respiratory insufficiency was not a dominant factor in determining mortality. These data suggest that COP alone is not a critical factor in determining either survival or respiratory insufficiency as measured by Qs/Qt in critically ill surgical patients.

摘要

通过每日同时测量血清胶体渗透压(COP)、肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)和肺内分流(Qs/Qt),前瞻性研究了COP及COP与PCWP之间的差值(COP-PCWP)对77例重症外科患者呼吸功能不全及生存情况的可能影响。生存者(N = 51)和非生存者(n = 26)的平均年龄分别为46±3岁(生存者)和58±4岁(非生存者)(p<0.01)。生存者的最低COP值(15±1托)与非生存者(14±1托)相似。生存者的最低COP-PCWP值为3±1托,非生存者为-1±2托(p<0.05)。COP-PCWP的差异主要是由于非生存者的PCWP(16±1托)显著高于生存者(12±1托)(p<0.01)。对于每位患者,在测量到的最低COP时测得的Qs/Qt在生存者和非生存者之间无显著差异(生存者为0.18±0.01,非生存者为0.20±0.01),在最低COP-PCWP时测量的结果也是如此(生存者为0.18±0.01,非生存者为0.21±0.01)。未发现最低COP或最低COP-PCWP与Qs/Qt之间存在相关性。进行性呼吸功能不全并非决定死亡率的主要因素。这些数据表明,仅COP并非决定重症外科患者生存或呼吸功能不全(以Qs/Qt衡量)的关键因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验