Teculescu D B, Bohadana A B, Peslin R, Pino J, Jansen da Silva J M
Clin Physiol. 1982 Apr;2(2):127-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1982.tb00015.x.
The variability (coefficient of variation of five consecutive measurements), reproducibility (difference of results at 1 h and 24 h), and interobserver difference (independent reading of the tracings by two observers) of airways resistance (Raw) and static lung volumes (residual volume, functional residual capacity, total lung capacity) using a body plethysmograph were assessed in 14 healthy subjects and in 25 patients with various respiratory disorders. The variability was low for TLC (4-5%), moderate for FRC (7-8%) and high for Raw (28%). No significant changes of Raw or lung volumes were found for the groups at 1 h and 24 h. Between observers, a slight difference existed for FRC and Raw in normal subjects; the difference was higher (4.5% for FRC and 11% for Raw) and became significant in patients. The overestimation of Raw by observer 2 as compared to observer 1 was more important at larger values. The present findings call for caution when pooling results obtained by several observers in large-scale studies, or when comparing figures obtained by different technicians in the pulmonary function laboratory.
在14名健康受试者和25名患有各种呼吸系统疾病的患者中,使用体容积描记法评估了气道阻力(Raw)和静态肺容积(残气量、功能残气量、肺总量)的变异性(连续五次测量的变异系数)、重现性(1小时和24小时结果的差异)以及观察者间差异(两名观察者对描记图的独立解读)。肺总量(TLC)的变异性较低(4 - 5%),功能残气量(FRC)的变异性中等(7 - 8%),气道阻力(Raw)的变异性较高(28%)。在1小时和24小时时,两组的气道阻力或肺容积均未发现显著变化。在正常受试者中,观察者之间功能残气量和气道阻力存在轻微差异;在患者中差异更大(功能残气量为4.5%,气道阻力为11%)且具有显著性。与观察者1相比,观察者2对气道阻力的高估在较大值时更为明显。目前的研究结果表明,在大规模研究中汇总多个观察者获得的结果时,或者在比较肺功能实验室中不同技术人员获得的数据时,需要谨慎。