Suppr超能文献

早产幼儿的体积描记法和阻断器阻力测量

Plethysmograph and interrupter resistance measurements in prematurely born young children.

作者信息

Thomas M R, Rafferty G F, Blowes R, Peacock J L, Marlow N, Calvert S, Milner A, Greenough A

机构信息

Department of Child Health, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, King's College Hospital, Bessemer Road, London SE5 9RS, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 May;91(3):F193-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.079608. Epub 2005 Oct 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Airways obstruction in premature infants is often assessed by plethysmography, which requires sedation. The interrupter (Rint) technique does not require sedation, but has rarely been examined in children under 2 years of age.

OBJECTIVE

To compare Rint results with plethysmographic measurements of airway resistance (Raw) in prematurely born, young children.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Infant and Paediatric Lung Function Laboratories.

PATIENTS

Thirty children with a median gestational age of 25-29 weeks and median postnatal age of 13 months.

INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The infants were sedated, airway resistance was measured by total body plethysmography (Raw), and Rint measurements were made using a MicroRint device. Further Raw and Rint measurements were made after salbutamol administration if the children remained asleep.

RESULTS

Baseline measurements of Raw and Rint were obtained from 30 and 26 respectively of the children. Mean baseline Rint values were higher than mean baseline Raw results (3.45 v 2.84 kPa/l/s, p = 0.006). Limits of agreement for the mean difference between Rint and Raw were -1.52 to 2.74 kPa/l/s. Ten infants received salbutamol, after which the mean Rint result was 3.6 kPa/l/s and mean Raw was 3.1 kPa/l/s (limits of agreement -0.28 to 1.44 kPa/l/s).

CONCLUSION

The poor agreement between Rint and Raw results suggests that Rint measurements cannot substitute for plethysmographic measurements in sedated prematurely born infants.

摘要

背景

早产儿气道阻塞常通过体积描记法评估,这需要镇静。阻断器(Rint)技术不需要镇静,但在2岁以下儿童中很少被研究。

目的

比较早产幼儿中Rint结果与气道阻力(Raw)的体积描记测量值。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

婴儿和儿科肺功能实验室。

患者

30名儿童,中位胎龄为25 - 29周,中位出生后年龄为13个月。

干预措施和主要观察指标

给婴儿镇静,通过全身体积描记法测量气道阻力(Raw),并使用MicroRint设备进行Rint测量。如果儿童仍处于睡眠状态,在给予沙丁胺醇后进一步测量Raw和Rint。

结果

分别从30名和26名儿童获得了Raw和Rint的基线测量值。平均基线Rint值高于平均基线Raw结果(3.45对2.84 kPa/l/s,p = 0.006)。Rint和Raw之间平均差异的一致性界限为-1.52至2.74 kPa/l/s。10名婴儿接受了沙丁胺醇治疗,之后平均Rint结果为3.6 kPa/l/s,平均Raw为3.1 kPa/l/s(一致性界限为-0.28至1.44 kPa/l/s)。

结论

Rint和Raw结果之间的一致性较差,表明在镇静的早产婴儿中,Rint测量不能替代体积描记测量。

相似文献

1
Plethysmograph and interrupter resistance measurements in prematurely born young children.早产幼儿的体积描记法和阻断器阻力测量
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 May;91(3):F193-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.079608. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
4
[Airway challenge testing - accuracy of the interrupter technique].
Pneumologie. 2001 Sep;55(9):425-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16949.
10
Interrupter technique in infancy: Higher airway resistance and lower short-term variability in preterm versus term infants.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1355-1362. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23771. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of ethnicity and extreme prematurity on infant pulmonary function.种族和极早产对婴儿肺功能的影响。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Jul;49(7):679-87. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22882. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Pulmonary function at follow-up of very preterm infants from the United Kingdom oscillation study.英国振荡研究中极早产儿随访时的肺功能
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Apr 1;169(7):868-72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200310-1425OC. Epub 2003 Dec 23.
3
Pulmonary function tests in preschool children with cystic fibrosis.患有囊性纤维化的学龄前儿童的肺功能测试
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Oct 15;166(8):1099-104. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200205-421OC.
5
Airway resistance estimation by best fit analysis in very premature infants.
Physiol Meas. 2002 May;23(2):279-85. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/23/2/304.
7
Evaluation of the interrupter technique in healthy, unsedated infants.
Eur Respir J. 2001 Dec;18(6):982-8. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.00221501.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验