Sorenson J A, Nelson J A, Niklason L A, Klauber M R
Invest Radiol. 1980 Nov-Dec;15(6):490-5. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198011000-00005.
Two techniques for simulating lung nodules in nodule detection studies were evaluated. In one technique, radiographs were obtained with plastic beads placed on the surface of a chest phantom to simulate lung nodules. In the second technique, the same plastic beads were radiographed against a uniform background, and their radiographic images were then superimposed photographically onto a radiograph of the same chest phantom. Nodule detection rates determined by four different film readers were significantly different for films prepared by the two different techniques. The differences in detection rates are explained by differences in nodule contrast due to film sensitometric characteristics and scattered radiation effects. Photographic superpositioning does not mimic these effects accurately, as they affect clinical chest films. For this reason, it is suggested that nodule simulation films prepared by the photographic superpositioning technique cannot be used to predict nodule detection rates for clinical chest radiography. Other aspects of lung nodule simulation techniques also are discussed.
在结节检测研究中,对两种模拟肺结节的技术进行了评估。在一种技术中,通过将塑料珠放置在胸部体模表面来获取X光片,以模拟肺结节。在第二种技术中,相同的塑料珠在均匀背景下进行X光摄影,然后将其X光图像通过摄影叠加到同一个胸部体模的X光片上。由四位不同的胶片阅片者确定的结节检测率,对于用两种不同技术制备的胶片来说有显著差异。检测率的差异是由胶片感光特性和散射辐射效应导致的结节对比度差异所解释的。摄影叠加不能准确模拟这些影响临床胸部X光片的效应。因此,建议不能使用通过摄影叠加技术制备的结节模拟胶片来预测临床胸部X光摄影的结节检测率。还讨论了肺结节模拟技术的其他方面。