Gerding D N
Postgrad Med. 1981 Apr;69(4):136-50. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1981.11715737.
For most pneumonia patients, an etiologic diagnosis can be established by proper use of noninvasive methods. Cultures of blood and pleural fluid and serologic titers are the most specific. The clinical history is helpful in distinguishing community- from hospital-acquired pneumonia and in identifying patients who are immunosuppressed or aspiration prone. When noninvasive diagnostic means and initial antibiotic therapy fail, the physician must choose between further empiric treatment and an invasive procedure with its attendant risks. For seriously ill and immunosuppressed patients, the need for an etiologic diagnosis is usually sufficient to justify these risks. The need for invasive diagnostic procedures is likely to increase in the future, necessitating greater knowledge of the relative risks and merits of each procedure on the part of all physicians who treat patients with pneumonia.
对于大多数肺炎患者,通过合理运用非侵入性方法即可确立病因诊断。血液和胸腔积液培养以及血清学滴度是最具特异性的。临床病史有助于区分社区获得性肺炎和医院获得性肺炎,并识别免疫抑制或易发生误吸的患者。当非侵入性诊断手段和初始抗生素治疗无效时,医生必须在进一步的经验性治疗和具有相应风险的侵入性操作之间做出选择。对于重症和免疫抑制患者,病因诊断的必要性通常足以证明这些风险是合理的。未来,侵入性诊断程序的需求可能会增加,这就要求所有治疗肺炎患者的医生更深入地了解每种程序的相对风险和优点。