Reed W W, Byrd G S, Gates R H, Howard R S, Weaver M J
Department of Medicine, Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
West J Med. 1996 Oct;165(4):197-204.
The usefulness of the sputum Gram's stain is controversial. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the sputum Gram's stain in community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. Using a predetermined protocol, articles were discovered through a MEDLINE search (1966 to 1993) and the examination of bibliographies and were graded for quality by three blinded reviewers. Information on the reference standard, blinding, stain interpreter, control for antibiotic use, and definition of a positive test was collected. We found 12 articles containing 17 test characteristics to evaluate. The number of patients in each study ranged from 16 to 404. Sputum culture was the most common reference standard (10 of 17 estimations). Sensitivity ranged from 15% to 100% and specificity from 11% to 100%. Test characteristics varied markedly among studies and appeared related partly to the test interpreter. The sputum Gram's stain may yield misleading results in community-acquired pneumonia, as its sensitivity and specificity vary substantially in different settings. A practitioner electing to use the study should be well trained and use a specific definition for a positive test.
痰液革兰氏染色的实用性存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估痰液革兰氏染色在社区获得性肺炎链球菌肺炎中的敏感性和特异性。按照预先设定的方案,通过医学文献数据库(MEDLINE,1966年至1993年)检索以及查阅参考文献目录来查找文章,并由三位盲法评审员对文章质量进行分级。收集了有关参考标准、盲法、染色解读人员、抗生素使用控制以及阳性检测定义的信息。我们发现了12篇包含17项待评估检测特征的文章。每项研究中的患者数量从16例到404例不等。痰液培养是最常用的参考标准(17项评估中有10项)。敏感性范围为15%至100%,特异性范围为11%至100%。不同研究间的检测特征差异显著,且部分似乎与检测解读人员有关。在社区获得性肺炎中,痰液革兰氏染色可能会产生误导性结果,因为其敏感性和特异性在不同情况下差异很大。选择使用该检测方法的从业者应接受良好培训,并对阳性检测采用特定定义。