Bortoff A, Michaels D, Mistretta P
Am J Physiol. 1981 Mar;240(3):C135-47. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1981.240.3.C135.
The purpose of these experiments was to test the hypothesis that circular muscle plays an active role in the propagation of intestinal slow waves, specifically be providing excitatory current through a process of regenerative amplification. With volume-recording techniques and microelectrode recordings we obtained the following results that are not consistent with such a mechanism: 1) slow waves propagated without delay or decrease in amplitude along segments of cat jejunum devoid of a ring of circular muscle up to 3 mm wide, i.e., across a longitudinal muscle bridge more than 4 space constants long (9 of 11 preparations) but did not propagate across a circumferential cut through the longitudinal muscle layer (14 of 14 preparations); 2) the membrane current associated with the slow wave had a pronounced inward component when recorded from either the serosal or the mucosal side of the longitudinal muscle bridge but was entirely outward when recorded from either the mucosal or the serosal side of exposed circular muscle, including those preparations in which various thicknesses of circular muscle were removed from the mucosal side of the recording area; 3) slow-wave amplitudes recorded intracellularly from intact (n = 9) and isolated (n = 8) longitudinal muscle preparations were not significantly different (27.0 +/- 4.3 vs. 25.4 +/- 5.3 (SD) mV); 4) after 30 min in 4.4 X 10(-6) M verapamil, slow-wave amplitude did not significantly decrease, although contractile activity had long since terminated. These results are more consistent with the hypothesis that longitudinal muscle provides most, if not all, of the current required for slow-wave propagation in the small intestine.
环形肌在肠道慢波的传播中发挥积极作用,具体而言是通过再生放大过程提供兴奋性电流。运用容积记录技术和微电极记录,我们得到了以下与该机制不符的结果:1)慢波沿猫空肠段无延迟或幅度减小地传播,该肠段没有宽达3毫米的环形肌环,即跨越超过4个空间常数长(11个标本中有9个)的纵肌桥,但不能跨越纵肌层的环切处(14个标本全部如此);2)从纵肌桥的浆膜侧或黏膜侧记录时,与慢波相关的膜电流有明显的内向成分,但从暴露的环形肌的黏膜侧或浆膜侧记录时,膜电流完全是外向的,包括那些从记录区域黏膜侧去除了不同厚度环形肌的标本;3)从完整的(n = 9)和分离的(n = 8)纵肌标本细胞内记录的慢波幅度无显著差异(分别为27.0 +/- 4.3与25.4 +/- 5.3(标准差)毫伏);4)在4.4×10⁻⁶ M维拉帕米中作用30分钟后,尽管收缩活动早已终止,但慢波幅度并未显著降低。这些结果更符合以下假设:纵肌为小肠慢波传播提供了大部分(如果不是全部)所需电流。