Suppr超能文献

布罗卡失语症和韦尼克失语症中的相邻性与相似性错语替换

Contiguity versus similarity paraphasic substitutions in Broca's and in Wernicke's aphasia.

作者信息

Gainotti G, Miceli G, Caltagirone C

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 1981 Jan;14(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(81)90042-3.

Abstract

The present research was carried out to determine whether Jakobson's claim that Broca's aphasic patients emit chiefly semantic paraphasias of the similarity type, whereas Wernicke's aphasic patients produce mainly paraphasic substitutions of the contiguity type, can be supported by data gathered for clinical purposes under controlled conditions. Semantic paraphasias produced by 96 aphasic patients on a standard test of visual naming were taken into account. Three independent judges, blind to aphasia type, classified all responses retained as semantic substitutions into one of the following four categories: those having 1) a strong similarity, 2) a strong contiguity, 3) a mild similarity, and 4) a mild contiguity relation to the correct word. No relationship was found between type of semantic paraphasias and clinical form of aphasia. Furthermore, irrespective of the clinical form of aphasia, aphasics tend to give more similarity substitutions than contiguity substitutions.

摘要

本研究旨在确定雅各布森的观点是否能得到在受控条件下为临床目的收集的数据的支持。雅各布森认为,布罗卡失语症患者主要产生相似类型的语义性错语,而韦尼克失语症患者主要产生邻近类型的错语替代。研究考虑了96名失语症患者在标准视觉命名测试中产生的语义性错语。三名对失语症类型不知情的独立评判员将所有保留为语义替代的反应分类为以下四类之一:1)与正确单词有强烈相似性;2)与正确单词有强烈邻近性;3)与正确单词有轻微相似性;4)与正确单词有轻微邻近性。未发现语义性错语类型与失语症临床形式之间存在关联。此外,无论失语症的临床形式如何,失语症患者倾向于给出比邻近性替代更多的相似性替代。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验