• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Test-retest stability and effects of psychophysical methods on the speech loudness discomfort level.

作者信息

Beattie R C, Sheffler M V

出版信息

Audiology. 1981;20(2):143-56. doi: 10.3109/00206098109072691.

DOI:10.3109/00206098109072691
PMID:7224979
Abstract

It is generally agreed that the saturation sound pressure level of a hearing aid should not exceed the patient's loudness discomfort level (LDL) for speech. This study investigated (1) the stability of the test and retest LDLs when obtained on different days using McCandless's and Berger's instructional sets and (2) the effects of a psychophysical method (adjustment versus limits) on the speech LDL using McCandless's instructions. Good reliability was observed since one-half of the listeners had test-retest differences of 2 dB or less and nearly all subjects obtained LDLs within 8 dB. The mean LDLs for the respective methods of adjustment and limits were 86.8 and 92.9 dB SPL, and statistically significant. Additionally, a significant interaction between the two methods was observed. The LDL measurement is also discussed in relation to other tests used to evaluate hearing aid performance.

摘要

相似文献

1
Test-retest stability and effects of psychophysical methods on the speech loudness discomfort level.
Audiology. 1981;20(2):143-56. doi: 10.3109/00206098109072691.
2
Effects of speech materials on the loudness discomfort level.言语材料对响度不适阈的影响。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1979 Nov;44(4):435-58. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4404.435.
3
Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):197-205.
4
Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects.听力受损受试者的纯音与言语响度不适阈之间的关系。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1986 May;51(2):120-5. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5102.120.
5
Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.助听器的饱和、连贯性及助听响度不适。
J Am Acad Audiol. 1992 Mar;3(2):81-93.
6
Hearing aid saturation and aided loudness discomfort.助听器饱和与助听响度不适。
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Feb;35(1):175-85. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3501.175.
7
The contour test of loudness perception.响度感知的等高线测试。
Ear Hear. 1997 Oct;18(5):388-400. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199710000-00004.
8
Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level.响度不适阈下的语音识别性能。
Scand Audiol. 1981;10(4):239-46. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076187.
9
Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level.时长、压缩以及助听响度不适阈。
Ear Hear. 2000 Aug;21(4):329-41. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200008000-00008.
10
Loudness discomfort level and reliability as a function of instructional set.响度不适阈及作为指令集函数的可靠性
Scand Audiol. 1993;22(2):125-31. doi: 10.3109/01050399309046028.