• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言语材料对响度不适阈的影响。

Effects of speech materials on the loudness discomfort level.

作者信息

Beattie R C, Edgerton B J, Gager D W

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1979 Nov;44(4):435-58. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4404.435.

DOI:10.1044/jshd.4404.435
PMID:513668
Abstract

Clinicians have used speech stimuli when measuring the loudness discomfort level (LDL) to determine the upper intensity limit for test stimulus presentation, and to select the saturation sound pressure level for an individual's hearing aid. Because little research has investigated the effects of speech stimuli on the LDL, this study was undertaken to compare LDLs using six commercially available speech materials on 120 normally hearing listeners. Our comparisons showed no significant differences between the mean scores for any of the speech stimuli. These findings suggest that any differences in the mean LDLs among studies probably are not attributable to the speech stimuli. The intrasession reliability of LDL measurement was also assessed using a modified method of limits procedure with 2-dB increments and instructions stressing initial discomfort. It was concluded that examiners probably could attain a high degree of reliability by simply averaging the results of two ascending trials, because 95% of these test/retest differences did not exceed 6 dB. Our findings were integrated with previous studies in terms of: (1) test stimuli; (2) listener experience; (3) instructional set; and (4) psychophysical method. This discussion points to many unanswered questions and concludes that the LDL should be interpreted very cautiously. Moreover, it is suggested that the stimuli selected for LDL measurement should reflect the examiner's purpose.

摘要

临床医生在测量响度不适级(LDL)时使用言语刺激,以确定测试刺激呈现的强度上限,并为个体助听器选择饱和声压级。由于很少有研究调查言语刺激对LDL的影响,因此本研究旨在比较120名听力正常的受试者使用六种市售言语材料时的LDL。我们的比较结果显示,任何言语刺激的平均得分之间均无显著差异。这些发现表明,不同研究中LDL平均值的差异可能并非归因于言语刺激。还使用了一种修改后的极限法程序(以2 dB递增,并强调初始不适的指导语)评估了LDL测量的会话内可靠性。得出的结论是,检查者可能只需将两次上升试验的结果平均,就能获得较高的可靠性,因为这些重测差异的95%不超过6 dB。我们的研究结果与之前的研究在以下方面进行了整合:(1)测试刺激;(2)受试者经验;(3)指导语设置;(4)心理物理学方法。该讨论指出了许多未解决的问题,并得出结论,对LDL的解释应非常谨慎。此外,建议为LDL测量选择的刺激应反映检查者的目的。

相似文献

1
Effects of speech materials on the loudness discomfort level.言语材料对响度不适阈的影响。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1979 Nov;44(4):435-58. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4404.435.
2
Test-retest stability and effects of psychophysical methods on the speech loudness discomfort level.
Audiology. 1981;20(2):143-56. doi: 10.3109/00206098109072691.
3
Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):197-205.
4
Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level.响度不适阈下的语音识别性能。
Scand Audiol. 1981;10(4):239-46. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076187.
5
Loudness discomfort level and reliability as a function of instructional set.响度不适阈及作为指令集函数的可靠性
Scand Audiol. 1993;22(2):125-31. doi: 10.3109/01050399309046028.
6
Loudness discomfort levels: a clinical procedure for hearing aid evaluations.响度不适阈:一种用于助听器评估的临床程序。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1980 Feb;45(1):3-15. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4501.03.
7
Loudness discomfort levels of hearing-impaired listeners using speech material.
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):206-10. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198007000-00005.
8
Magnitude estimation of loudness. I: Application to hearing aid selection.响度的量级估计。I:在助听器选择中的应用。
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Mar;27(1):20-7. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2701.20.
9
[Loudness discomfort level in normal hearing individuals].[正常听力个体的响度不适阈]
Pro Fono. 2006 Jan-Apr;18(1):31-40. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000100005.
10
Comparison of clinical and real-life judgments of loudness discomfort.响度不适的临床判断与实际生活判断的比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 1992 May;3(3):193-9.