• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

响度不适阈下的语音识别性能。

Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level.

作者信息

Dirks D D, Kamm C A, Dubno J R, Velde T M

出版信息

Scand Audiol. 1981;10(4):239-46. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076187.

DOI:10.3109/01050398109076187
PMID:7323674
Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the relationship between the loudness discomfort level (LDL) and maximum speech recognition performance for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Performance-intensity functions were obtained for 30 listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing impairment at five speech levels from -18 to +4 dB re: the LDL. Recognition scores were obtained for three speech materials. For all speech materials, recognition scores at levels below the LDL were equivalent to or higher than scores obtained at and above the LDL. These results support the contention that the LDL represents a sound pressure level above which no improvement in speech recognition occurs, and thus, might reasonably be used as the appropriate level for the saturation sound pressure level of a hearing aid.

摘要

本实验的目的是确定感音神经性听力损失患者的响度不适阈(LDL)与最大言语识别性能之间的关系。对30名轻度至中度感音神经性听力障碍患者,在相对于LDL为-18至+4 dB的五个言语声级下获得了性能-强度函数。针对三种言语材料获得了识别分数。对于所有言语材料,低于LDL声级的识别分数等于或高于在LDL及LDL以上声级获得的分数。这些结果支持了这样的观点,即LDL代表了一个声压级,高于该声压级言语识别不会得到改善,因此,可以合理地将其用作助听器饱和声压级的合适水平。

相似文献

1
Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level.响度不适阈下的语音识别性能。
Scand Audiol. 1981;10(4):239-46. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076187.
2
Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):197-205.
3
Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.助听器中扩展范围频率响应放大的效果。
J Aud Res. 1982 Jan;22(1):37-43.
4
Loudness discomfort levels of hearing-impaired listeners using speech material.
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):206-10. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198007000-00005.
5
Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Audiology. 1982;21(3):251-68. doi: 10.3109/00206098209072743.
6
A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition scores.为使单词识别分数最大化而进行的呈现水平比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):381-90. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.6.6.
7
Magnitude estimation of loudness. III: Performance of selected hearing aid users.
J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Sep;28(3):411-20. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2803.411.
8
Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Dec;21(4):668-81. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2104.668.
9
Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.助听器的饱和、连贯性及助听响度不适。
J Am Acad Audiol. 1992 Mar;3(2):81-93.
10
Loudness discrimination of speech signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Dec;42(6):1285-94. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4206.1285.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition scores.为使单词识别分数最大化而进行的呈现水平比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):381-90. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.6.6.