Wyler A R, Burchiel K J
Brain Res. 1981 May 18;212(2):309-29. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90465-0.
(1) Six Macaca mulatta monkeys were rendered chronically epileptic by subpial alumina injection in left precentral cortex. The monkeys were then trained to operantly control the firing patterns of single units from the epileptic focus and contralateral homotopic cortex using a standardized paradigm. In 30 experiments, units were recorded simultaneously from both hemispheres. (2) For epileptic and normal neurons, there are no consistent relationships between cortical EEG spikes and unit firing. (3) Previous parameters for quantifying single unit epileptogenicity are not adequate for defining the complex spectrum and relative degree of unit abnormalities within the chronic focus. A primary difference between normal and epileptic neurons is that monkeys can modify the firing pattern and rate of the former but can modify, only slightly, the integrated firing rate of the latter. (4) A previously described 'non-burst' epileptiform firing pattern consisting of 8--18 msec doublets is investigated in further detail. This pattern may represent units along a continuum between normalcy and long-first-interval burst firing. (5) The majority of epileptic units' firing patterns become more normal when the monkey is reinforced to control the firing pattern of a contralateral unit. Then, if the monkey is reinforced to control the epileptic unit, subtle abnormal firing patterns become more apparent. Therefore, the firing patterns of epileptic units are effected in two ways: the non-specific effect of alerting to the operant task, and the more specific effect that accompanies the monkey's attempts to attain reinforcement when it is contingent on the behavior of the specific neuron. (6) Although epileptiform EEG spikes are projected to homotopic contralateral precentral cortex, there is no evidence to suggest that single units within such cortex fire in patterns correlative with intrinsic epileptogenic burst generating properties. Therefore, if the 'mirror focus' is defined as cortex which has become autonomously epileptogenic secondary to persistent transsynaptic activity from a primary focus, these data do not support the concept that mirror foci develop in primate precentral cortex.
(1) 通过在左侧中央前皮质进行软脑膜下注射明矾,使6只恒河猴患慢性癫痫。然后使用标准化范式训练这些猴子通过操作来控制癫痫病灶和对侧同位皮质单个神经元的放电模式。在30次实验中,同时记录了两个半球的神经元。(2) 对于癫痫神经元和正常神经元,皮质脑电图尖峰与神经元放电之间没有一致的关系。(3) 以前用于量化单个神经元致痫性的参数不足以定义慢性病灶内神经元异常的复杂频谱和相对程度。正常神经元和癫痫神经元之间的一个主要区别是,猴子可以改变前者的放电模式和频率,但只能轻微改变后者的综合放电频率。(4) 对先前描述的由8 - 18毫秒双峰组成的“非爆发性”癫痫样放电模式进行了更详细的研究。这种模式可能代表了处于正常状态和长初始间隔爆发性放电之间连续体上的神经元。(5) 当猴子被强化以控制对侧神经元的放电模式时,大多数癫痫神经元的放电模式会变得更正常。然后,如果猴子被强化以控制癫痫神经元,细微的异常放电模式会变得更加明显。因此,癫痫神经元的放电模式受到两种方式的影响:对操作任务警觉的非特异性效应,以及当强化取决于特定神经元的行为时,猴子试图获得强化所伴随的更特异性效应。(6) 虽然癫痫样脑电图尖峰投射到对侧同位中央前皮质,但没有证据表明该皮质内的单个神经元以与内在致痫爆发产生特性相关的模式放电。因此,如果将“镜像病灶”定义为由于来自原发性病灶的持续跨突触活动而自主产生癫痫的皮质,这些数据不支持灵长类动物中央前皮质中存在镜像病灶的概念。