Merin L M
Ann Ophthalmol. 1980 Apr;12(4):441-3.
Nineteen years after the pioneering efforts of Novotny and Alvis, fluorescein angiography has reached a level of acceptance and use which reflects its high value in ophthalmic diagnosis. Angiography laboratories are commonplace in hospitals, and many private physicians own fundus cameras and perform fluorescein angiograms routinely. As the use of this test has substantially increased, so has the number of methods used to present the film for analysis and interpretation. At this writing there are no fewer than 12 different ways of presenting fluorescein angiograms in common use (Table 1). Not all of these techniques are able to yield equal amounts of information, however, and as consultations between different laboratories occur, much difficulty results from the disparate styles. Evaluation of these varying techniques of fluorescein angiography presentation depends on the production complexity and the amount of useful information which each may yield.
在诺沃特尼和阿尔维斯开创性努力的19年后,荧光素血管造影已达到被广泛接受和使用的程度,这反映出其在眼科诊断中的高价值。血管造影实验室在医院中很常见,许多私人医生拥有眼底相机并常规进行荧光素血管造影。随着这项检查的使用大幅增加,用于展示胶片以供分析和解读的方法数量也增加了。在撰写本文时,常用的展示荧光素血管造影的方法不少于12种(表1)。然而,并非所有这些技术都能产生等量的信息,并且随着不同实验室之间会诊的出现,不同的样式导致了很多困难。对这些不同的荧光素血管造影展示技术的评估取决于制作的复杂性以及每种技术可能产生的有用信息量。