Bell E G, McAfee J G, Makhuli Z N
Semin Nucl Med. 1981 Apr;11(2):105-27. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2998(81)80041-4.
The diagnostic work-up of the urologic patient must be tailored to the presenting symptom complex, carefully selecting from the many modilities available, those most likely to establish the diagnosis and extent of the suspected lesions. Intravenous urography is the most rewarding initial procedure for many presenting symptoms, including suspected masses, pyuria, hematuria, and flank pain. Nuclear imaging is particularly effective in differentiating renal lobulations from true masses, in demonstrating parenchymal scarring in chronic pyelonephritis when the IVP is equivocal, and in assessing the decrease in perfusion and function in obstructive nephropathy when the IVP is indeterminate. It is the preferred procedure for acute renal infarction and acute tubular necrosis and has a greater sensitivity of detection for renal trauma than the IVP. Gallium-67 renal imaging appear helpful in the detection of occult pyelonephritis or interstitial nephritis. However, it cannot differentiate focal acute pyelonephritis from abscess or abscess from neoplasm. Ultrasoneography is the initial procedure of choice in the differentiation of cystic from solid renal masses and in anuria or oliguria. When a kidney fails to visualize by IVP or nuclear imaging, it can confirm or rule out obstruction. In upper tract infections, it may demonstrate renal or perirenal abscess. Although retrograde pyelography is performed less frequently in recent years, it remains extremely useful in confirming and relieving obstructive uropathy and in delineating tumors of the collecting system. Computed tomography effectively demonstrates hydronephrosis, renal abscess, tumors, and cysts and retroperitoneal involvement. More experience is needed to judge the efficiency of "dynamic" CT for the quantification of renal function. Renal angiography remains invaluable as a secondary procedure (as opposed to initial screening) in renal trauma, vascular anomalies, and in renal tumors to delineate the anatomy of the arterial supply and possible renal vein involvement.
泌尿外科患者的诊断检查必须根据所呈现的症状复合体进行调整,从众多可用的检查方法中仔细选择那些最有可能确立诊断及疑似病变范围的方法。静脉肾盂造影术对于许多呈现的症状,包括疑似肿块、脓尿、血尿和胁腹痛,是最有价值的初始检查方法。核成像在区分肾叶与真正肿块方面特别有效,当静脉肾盂造影结果不明确时,可显示慢性肾盂肾炎的实质瘢痕,当静脉肾盂造影结果不确定时,可评估梗阻性肾病的灌注和功能降低情况。它是急性肾梗死和急性肾小管坏死的首选检查方法,对肾外伤的检测敏感性比静脉肾盂造影更高。镓 - 67肾成像似乎有助于隐匿性肾盂肾炎或间质性肾炎的检测。然而,它无法区分局灶性急性肾盂肾炎与脓肿或脓肿与肿瘤。超声检查是区分肾囊性肿块与实性肿块以及无尿或少尿时的首选初始检查方法。当肾脏在静脉肾盂造影或核成像中不显影时,它可以确认或排除梗阻。在上尿路感染中,它可能显示肾或肾周脓肿。尽管近年来逆行肾盂造影术的实施频率较低,但它在确认和缓解梗阻性尿路病以及描绘集合系统肿瘤方面仍然极其有用。计算机断层扫描有效地显示肾盂积水、肾脓肿、肿瘤、囊肿以及腹膜后受累情况。判断“动态”CT在肾功能定量方面的效率还需要更多经验。肾血管造影术作为肾外伤、血管异常以及肾肿瘤的二级检查方法(与初始筛查相对),在描绘动脉供应解剖结构和可能的肾静脉受累情况方面仍然具有重要价值。