• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[水性塑料提取物溶血活性评估方法的比较研究。初步报告]

[Comparative study of methods of estimating the hemolytic activity of aqueous plastic extracts. Preliminary report].

作者信息

Borzemska M

出版信息

Polim Med. 1978;8(2):57-64.

PMID:724567
Abstract

The examination of haemolytic activity of aqueous plastic extracts represents one of the method to evaluate plastics of medical grade. In own examinations different methods were used to estimate the haemolytic activity of aqueous extracts of some toxic materials, e.g. technical gums, epoxides, also silicone resins, which are admitted to medical use. On the basis of literature and own examinations the most sensitive method to estimate the haemolytic test was found to be the method after the Japanese Pharmacopoeia. The degree of haemolysis due to the water extracts both of technical gums and epoxides was found to be significantly different from the norms. The silicone resins fulfilled the demands for medical materials. On the basis of the results, the method described in the Japanese Pharmacopoeia was accepted as an appropriate test for evaluation of haemolytic activity of aqueous plastic extracts designed to blood contact or to implantation.

摘要

水性塑料提取物溶血活性的检测是评估医用级塑料的方法之一。在我们自己的检测中,使用了不同的方法来评估一些有毒材料(如工业用胶、环氧化合物以及获准用于医疗用途的硅树脂)的水性提取物的溶血活性。基于文献和我们自己的检测,发现评估溶血试验最灵敏的方法是日本药典中的方法。结果发现,工业用胶和环氧化合物的水提取物引起的溶血程度与标准有显著差异。硅树脂符合医用材料的要求。基于这些结果,日本药典中描述的方法被认可为评估用于血液接触或植入的水性塑料提取物溶血活性的合适检测方法。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study of methods of estimating the hemolytic activity of aqueous plastic extracts. Preliminary report].[水性塑料提取物溶血活性评估方法的比较研究。初步报告]
Polim Med. 1978;8(2):57-64.
2
[Estimation of biocompatibility of fibers with large mechanical resistance].[具有高机械抗性的纤维的生物相容性评估]
Polim Med. 2004;34(3):3-48.
3
[Use of biological methods in the testing of extracts of plastics (preliminary report)].
Polim Med. 1978;8(3):135-44.
4
Toxicity of plastic materials as evaluated by means of bull semen (preliminary report).
Pol J Pharmacol Pharm. 1980 Jan-Feb;32(1):109-14.
5
[Comparative studies in vitro of the toxic effect of water extracts from synthetic materials in biological tests on living cells].
Polim Med. 1982;12(3-4):79-130.
6
[Biocompatibility of graded zirconia-hydroxyapatite composite].[梯度氧化锆-羟基磷灰石复合材料的生物相容性]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 May;20(5):569-73.
7
[Biocompatibility assessment of aqueous extracts from new multiblock poly(ester-ester) copolymer].新型多嵌段聚(酯-酯)共聚物水提取物的生物相容性评估
Polim Med. 2000;30(3-4):83-7.
8
A comparative study on aqueous root extracts of Pueraria thomsonii and Pueraria lobata by antioxidant assay and HPLC fingerprint analysis.通过抗氧化测定和高效液相色谱指纹图谱分析对粉葛和野葛水提物进行的比较研究。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2005 Jan 4;96(1-2):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.08.029.
9
Comparison of three methods of toxicity evaluation of medical plastics.三种医用塑料毒性评估方法的比较
Pol J Pharmacol Pharm. 1980 Jan-Feb;32(1):99-102.
10
Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.弹性印模材料的预设和亲水后特性
J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;16(4):238-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00205.x. Epub 2007 Jun 9.