Gomez E C, Trancik R J
Dermatologica. 1981;162(3):175-82. doi: 10.1159/000250266.
The relative topical efficacy of indomethacin and diflumidone, a novel non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug, for the suppression of ultraviolet-light (290-320 nm region; UVB)-induced erythema has been compared in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in man. During the early phases of erythema development (3-6 h) following the administration of 3 minimal erythema doses (MED) of UVB, a single topical application of diflumidone and of indomethacin were found to be equal in their ability to inhibit the development of erythema compared to untreated or placebo-treated sites. At 24 h after application, the indomethacin-treated sites had significantly less erythema than did the diflumidone-treated sites. Pigmentation of test sites at 5 and 14 days following irradiation was indistinguishable at the diflumidone, placebo, or untreated sites, but relatively less pigment developed at the indomethacin-treated sites.
在一项针对人体的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,比较了吲哚美辛与新型非甾体抗炎药双氟米酮局部应用对抑制紫外线(290 - 320纳米波段;UVB)诱导的红斑的疗效。在给予3个最小红斑量(MED)的UVB后红斑发展的早期阶段(3 - 6小时),发现单次局部应用双氟米酮和吲哚美辛抑制红斑发展的能力与未治疗或安慰剂治疗部位相当。用药后24小时,吲哚美辛治疗部位的红斑明显少于双氟米酮治疗部位。照射后5天和14天,双氟米酮、安慰剂或未治疗部位的测试部位色素沉着无明显差异,但吲哚美辛治疗部位形成的色素相对较少。