• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于瓜廖尔麻风病诊所就诊的麻风病患者社会耻辱感的研究。

A study of social stigma among leprosy patients attending leprosy clinic in Gwalior.

作者信息

Kushwah S S, Govila A K, Upadhyay S, Kushwah J

出版信息

Lepr India. 1981 Apr;53(2):221-5.

PMID:7253574
Abstract

The present study is a longitudinal study and was undertaken from November 1977 to January 1979. The study included 344 cases of leprosy patients from different areas. The data was collected, tabulated and analysed which revealed the following salient features. 26.45% cases were having one, or more than one type of social stigma, 42.86% cases showed social stigma from their neighbours. 62.64% cases were having stigma for touch, 30.77% cases were in age group of 45--54 years. Males were more victims of social stigma, than females. The social stigma was more prevalent in illiterates and low socio-economic group patients. 69.03% cases were in need of social rehabilitation.

摘要

本研究为纵向研究,于1977年11月至1979年1月进行。该研究纳入了来自不同地区的344例麻风病患者。收集、制表并分析了数据,结果显示出以下显著特征。26.45%的病例存在一种或多种社会耻辱感,42.86%的病例受到邻居的社会耻辱对待。62.64%的病例因接触而受到耻辱,30.77%的病例年龄在45 - 54岁之间。男性比女性更容易成为社会耻辱的受害者。社会耻辱在文盲和社会经济地位较低的患者中更为普遍。69.03%的病例需要社会康复。

相似文献

1
A study of social stigma among leprosy patients attending leprosy clinic in Gwalior.一项关于瓜廖尔麻风病诊所就诊的麻风病患者社会耻辱感的研究。
Lepr India. 1981 Apr;53(2):221-5.
2
Extent and correlates of leprosy stigma in rural India.印度农村麻风病耻辱感的程度及其相关因素。
Indian J Lepr. 2008 Apr-Jun;80(2):167-74.
3
An epidemiological study of disabilities among leprosy patients attending leprosy clinic in Gwalior.
Lepr India. 1981 Apr;53(2):240-7.
4
Gender difference in socio-epidemiological factors for leprosy in the most hyper-endemic district of Nepal.尼泊尔麻风病高度流行地区麻风病社会流行病学因素中的性别差异。
Nepal Med Coll J. 2004 Dec;6(2):98-105.
5
A study of contacts among leprosy patients.
Lepr India. 1980 Jul;52(3):411-5.
6
Curing the stigma of leprosy.消除麻风病的污名。
Lepr Rev. 2005 Jun;76(2):119-26.
7
Stigma in leprosy: miles to go!麻风病的耻辱:任重道远!
Indian J Lepr. 2010 Jul-Sep;82(3):137-45.
8
Assessing socio-economic factors in relation to stigmatization, impairment status, and selection for socio-economic rehabilitation: a 1-year cohort of new leprosy cases in north Bangladesh.评估与污名化、损伤状况及社会经济康复选择相关的社会经济因素:孟加拉国北部新麻风病例的1年队列研究。
Lepr Rev. 2003 Jun;74(2):120-32.
9
Social stigma: a comparative qualitative study of integrated and vertical care approaches to leprosy.社会污名:麻风病综合与垂直治疗方法的比较质性研究
Lepr Rev. 2002 Jun;73(2):186-96.
10
Women and leprosy in Turkey.土耳其的女性与麻风病。
Indian J Lepr. 1993 Jan-Mar;65(1):59-67.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of perceptions and knowledge of leprosy in the elimination of leprosy: A baseline study in Fatehpur district, northern India.麻风病认知和知识在消除麻风病中的作用:印度北部法特普尔地区的基线研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Apr 5;13(4):e0007302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007302. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Perceived Stigma towards Leprosy among Community Members Living Close to Nonsomboon Leprosy Colony in Thailand.泰国农宋布麻风病隔离区附近社区居民对麻风病的感知耻辱感
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):e0129086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129086. eCollection 2015.